Eric Smith
Balance del jugador
Datos del perfil: SofaScore
Eric Smith
His historical profile. Next-match context appears when the fixture is known.
At least one goal
Historical reference · awaiting the next fixture
Where does he deliver?
FC St. Pauli · Match season · 2026-08-23 → 2026-09-28
Dot: observed success · Band: 95% uncertainty. Odds ±0.10 · Defence ±20% (minimum ±0.25 goals). Historical outcomes; groups may overlap.
Polonia
Goals conceded per game. Overall includes friendlies. Home/Away refers to Poland. Competition: UEFA Nations League, League B, Gr. 4. Team Odd: the player’s team win price, within ±0.10. Bars relative to the daily maximum.
His general tendencies
Observed history, not a guarantee for the next match. Trends can share the same games.
See evidence and results
Model index, not a measured hit rate. Scenarios and rhythm describe overlapping history; their percentages are not added together.
At least one goal
Scored in 0 of 2 appearances
Playing time → chances → outcomes
Last 5 appearance averages compared with earlier ones. These are observations, not projected next-match minutes.
How precise is this sample? · 2 appearances
The observed rate of 0% has an uncertainty interval of 0–66%. Small samples leave a wider margin. This is not the probability of the next match.
His record at comparable odds
Same team, decimal odds within ±10% of the input quote. Scorer odds remain scorer odds, including on the assist tab. Historical frequencies, not a next-match probability.
His rhythm: success → no success
Oldest to newest. 1 = success, 0 = none, ? = missing. For Goal / assist, 1 means either action.
○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0
0 · All his contexts
Next appearance: 5% · 3/57
Context reference: 6% · 4/63
0 · Same venue
Next appearance: 0% · 0/26
Context reference: 3% · 1/29
0 · Similar defensive strength
Next appearance: 0% · 0/1
Context reference: 0% · 0/2
0 → 0 · All his contexts
Next appearance: 4% · 2/51
Context reference: 6% · 4/62
0 → 0 · Same venue
Next appearance: 0% · 0/23
Context reference: 3% · 1/29
0 → 0 · Similar defensive strength
Next appearance: 0% · 0/1
Context reference: 0% · 0/2
0 → 0 → 0 · All his contexts
Next appearance: 4% · 2/46
Context reference: 7% · 4/61
0 → 0 → 0 · Same venue
Next appearance: 0% · 0/21
Context reference: 3% · 1/29
0 → 0 → 0 · Similar defensive strength
Next appearance: 0% · 0/1
Context reference: 0% · 0/2
Repeated sequences may be informative. A scoreless appearance does not make a goal due.
Conditions to assess
Conditions found in his own history, then checked on later appearances. Failures are included.
All conditions in one scenario must hold together. Scenarios describe the same player; do not add their successes together. Start with its later results, then compare other contexts over the same period. Strong discovery results alone are insufficient.
Scenario 1Unconfirmed
- Kickoff hour (Paris) · 17 to <21
- Expected goals (xG) · 2 appearances ago ≤ 0.121
- Expected goals (xG) · previous appearance ≤ 0.121
Scenario discovery · 2/5
2 successes in 5 appearances used to find these conditions. This result selected the scenario; it is not its validation.
Consistency over time · varying effect
The same rule, unchanged between periods. These subsets are not independent confirmations.
Scenario 2Unconfirmed
- Expected goals (xG) · previous appearance ≤ 0.121
- Expected goals (xG) · 2 appearances ago ≤ 0.121
- Form across teams · Minutes played · previous 5 average ≤ 90
Scenario discovery · 2/5
2 successes in 5 appearances used to find these conditions. This result selected the scenario; it is not its validation.
Consistency over time · too few cases
The same rule, unchanged between periods. These subsets are not independent confirmations.
Scenario 3Unconfirmed
- Kickoff hour (Paris) · 17 to <21
- Player: Goals per 90, previous 10 appearances · 0 to <0.2
- Expected goals (xG) · previous appearance ≤ 0.121
Scenario discovery · 3/10
3 successes in 10 appearances used to find these conditions. This result selected the scenario; it is not its validation.
Consistency over time · varying effect
The same rule, unchanged between periods. These subsets are not independent confirmations.
At least one assist
Historical reference · awaiting the next fixture
Where does he deliver?
FC St. Pauli · Match season · 2026-08-23 → 2026-09-28
Dot: observed success · Band: 95% uncertainty. Odds ±0.10 · Defence ±20% (minimum ±0.25 goals). Historical outcomes; groups may overlap.
Polonia
Goals conceded per game. Overall includes friendlies. Home/Away refers to Poland. Competition: UEFA Nations League, League B, Gr. 4. Team Odd: the player’s team win price, within ±0.10. Bars relative to the daily maximum.
His general tendencies
Observed history, not a guarantee for the next match. Trends can share the same games.
See evidence and results
Model index, not a measured hit rate. Scenarios and rhythm describe overlapping history; their percentages are not added together.
At least one assist
Provided an assist in 0 of 2 appearances
Playing time → chances → outcomes
Last 5 appearance averages compared with earlier ones. These are observations, not projected next-match minutes.
How precise is this sample? · 2 appearances
The observed rate of 0% has an uncertainty interval of 0–66%. Small samples leave a wider margin. This is not the probability of the next match.
His record at comparable odds
Same team, decimal odds within ±10% of the input quote. Scorer odds remain scorer odds, including on the assist tab. Historical frequencies, not a next-match probability.
His rhythm: success → no success
Oldest to newest. 1 = success, 0 = none, ? = missing. For Goal / assist, 1 means either action.
○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0
0 · All his contexts
Next appearance: 3% · 2/59
Context reference: 3% · 2/63
0 · Same venue
Next appearance: 4% · 1/26
Context reference: 3% · 1/29
0 · Similar defensive strength
Next appearance: 0% · 0/2
Context reference: 0% · 0/2
0 → 0 · All his contexts
Next appearance: 4% · 2/54
Context reference: 3% · 2/62
0 → 0 · Same venue
Next appearance: 4% · 1/24
Context reference: 3% · 1/29
0 → 0 · Similar defensive strength
Next appearance: 0% · 0/1
Context reference: 0% · 0/2
0 → 0 → 0 · All his contexts
Next appearance: 4% · 2/49
Context reference: 3% · 2/61
0 → 0 → 0 · Same venue
Next appearance: 5% · 1/22
Context reference: 3% · 1/29
0 → 0 → 0 · Similar defensive strength
Next appearance: 0% · 0/1
Context reference: 0% · 0/2
Repeated sequences may be informative. A scoreless appearance does not make a goal due.
Conditions to assess
Conditions found in his own history, then checked on later appearances. Failures are included.
All conditions in one scenario must hold together. Scenarios describe the same player; do not add their successes together. Start with its later results, then compare other contexts over the same period. Strong discovery results alone are insufficient.
Scenario 1Unconfirmed
- Form across teams · Goals · previous 5 average ≤ 0
- Expected goals (xG) · previous appearance ≤ 0.054
- Venue · Home
Scenario discovery · 1/5
1 successes in 5 appearances used to find these conditions. This result selected the scenario; it is not its validation.
Consistency over time · too few cases
The same rule, unchanged between periods. These subsets are not independent confirmations.
Scenario 2Unconfirmed
- Venue · Home
- Form across teams · Goals · previous 5 average ≤ 0
- Expected goals (xG) · previous appearance ≤ 0.099
- Form across teams · Minutes played · previous appearance ≤ 90
Scenario discovery · 1/5
1 successes in 5 appearances used to find these conditions. This result selected the scenario; it is not its validation.
Consistency over time · too few cases
The same rule, unchanged between periods. These subsets are not independent confirmations.
Scenario 3Unconfirmed
- Venue · Home
- Form across teams · Goals · previous 5 average ≤ 0
- Expected goals (xG) · previous appearance ≤ 0.099
- Form across teams · Minutes played · previous 5 average ≤ 94.4
Scenario discovery · 1/5
1 successes in 5 appearances used to find these conditions. This result selected the scenario; it is not its validation.
Consistency over time · too few cases
The same rule, unchanged between periods. These subsets are not independent confirmations.
A goal or an assist
Historical reference · awaiting the next fixture
Where does he deliver?
FC St. Pauli · Match season · 2026-08-23 → 2026-09-28
Dot: observed success · Band: 95% uncertainty. Odds ±0.10 · Defence ±20% (minimum ±0.25 goals). Historical outcomes; groups may overlap.
Polonia
Goals conceded per game. Overall includes friendlies. Home/Away refers to Poland. Competition: UEFA Nations League, League B, Gr. 4. Team Odd: the player’s team win price, within ±0.10. Bars relative to the daily maximum.
His general tendencies
Observed history, not a guarantee for the next match. Trends can share the same games.
See evidence and results
Model index, not a measured hit rate. Scenarios and rhythm describe overlapping history; their percentages are not added together.
A goal or an assist
Scored or provided an assist in 0 of 2 appearances
Playing time → chances → outcomes
Last 5 appearance averages compared with earlier ones. These are observations, not projected next-match minutes.
How precise is this sample? · 2 appearances
The observed rate of 0% has an uncertainty interval of 0–66%. Small samples leave a wider margin. This is not the probability of the next match.
His record at comparable odds
Same team, decimal odds within ±10% of the input quote. Scorer odds remain scorer odds, including on the assist tab. Historical frequencies, not a next-match probability.
His rhythm: success → no success
Oldest to newest. 1 = success, 0 = none, ? = missing. For Goal / assist, 1 means either action.
○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0 → ○ 0
0 · All his contexts
Next appearance: 7% · 4/55
Context reference: 10% · 6/63
0 · Same venue
Next appearance: 4% · 1/25
Context reference: 7% · 2/29
0 · Similar defensive strength
Next appearance: 0% · 0/1
Context reference: 0% · 0/2
0 → 0 · All his contexts
Next appearance: 6% · 3/48
Context reference: 10% · 6/62
0 → 0 · Same venue
Next appearance: 5% · 1/21
Context reference: 7% · 2/29
0 → 0 · Similar defensive strength
Next appearance: 0% · 0/1
Context reference: 0% · 0/2
0 → 0 → 0 · All his contexts
Next appearance: 7% · 3/42
Context reference: 10% · 6/61
0 → 0 → 0 · Same venue
Next appearance: 5% · 1/20
Context reference: 7% · 2/29
0 → 0 → 0 · Similar defensive strength
Next appearance: 0% · 0/1
Context reference: 0% · 0/2
Repeated sequences may be informative. A scoreless appearance does not make a goal due.
Conditions to assess
Conditions found in his own history, then checked on later appearances. Failures are included.
All conditions in one scenario must hold together. Scenarios describe the same player; do not add their successes together. Start with its later results, then compare other contexts over the same period. Strong discovery results alone are insufficient.
Scenario 1Unconfirmed
- Kickoff hour (Paris) · 17 to <21
- Expected goals (xG) · 2 appearances ago ≤ 0.121
- Expected goals (xG) · previous appearance ≤ 0.121
Scenario discovery · 2/5
2 successes in 5 appearances used to find these conditions. This result selected the scenario; it is not its validation.
Consistency over time · varying effect
The same rule, unchanged between periods. These subsets are not independent confirmations.
Scenario 2Unconfirmed
- Form across teams · Minutes played · previous 5 average ≤ 90
- Expected goals (xG) · previous appearance ≤ 0.121
- Expected goals (xG) · 2 appearances ago ≤ 0.121
Scenario discovery · 2/5
2 successes in 5 appearances used to find these conditions. This result selected the scenario; it is not its validation.
Consistency over time · too few cases
The same rule, unchanged between periods. These subsets are not independent confirmations.
Scenario 3Unconfirmed
- Form across teams · Goals · previous 5 average ≤ 0
- Expected goals (xG) · previous appearance ≤ 0.054
- Venue · Home
Scenario discovery · 2/5
2 successes in 5 appearances used to find these conditions. This result selected the scenario; it is not its validation.
Consistency over time · too few cases
The same rule, unchanged between periods. These subsets are not independent confirmations.
At least 2 shots
Historical reference · awaiting the next fixture
Where does he deliver?
FC St. Pauli · Match season · 2026-08-23 → 2026-09-28
Dot: observed success · Band: 95% uncertainty. Odds ±0.10 · Defence ±20% (minimum ±0.25 goals). Historical outcomes; groups may overlap.
Polonia
Goals conceded per game. Overall includes friendlies. Home/Away refers to Poland. Competition: UEFA Nations League, League B, Gr. 4. Team Odd: the player’s team win price, within ±0.10. Bars relative to the daily maximum.
His general tendencies
Observed history, not a guarantee for the next match. Trends can share the same games.
See evidence and results
Model index, not a measured hit rate. Scenarios and rhythm describe overlapping history; their percentages are not added together.
At least 2 shots
Attempted at least 2 shots in 0 of 2 appearances
Playing time → chances → outcomes
Last 5 appearance averages compared with earlier ones. These are observations, not projected next-match minutes.
How precise is this sample? · 2 appearances
The observed rate of 0% has an uncertainty interval of 0–66%. Small samples leave a wider margin. This is not the probability of the next match.
His record at comparable odds
Same team, decimal odds within ±10% of the input quote. Scorer odds remain scorer odds, including on the assist tab. Historical frequencies, not a next-match probability.
Conditions to assess
Conditions found in his own history, then checked on later appearances. Failures are included.
All conditions in one scenario must hold together. Scenarios describe the same player; do not add their successes together. Start with its later results, then compare other contexts over the same period. Strong discovery results alone are insufficient.
Scenario 1Unconfirmed
- Kickoff hour (Paris) · 17 to <21
- Expected goals (xG) · 2 appearances ago ≤ 0.121
- Form across teams · Goals · previous appearance ≤ 0
Scenario discovery · 3/6
3 successes in 6 appearances used to find these conditions. This result selected the scenario; it is not its validation.
Consistency over time · varying effect
The same rule, unchanged between periods. These subsets are not independent confirmations.
Scenario 2Unconfirmed
- Kickoff hour (Paris) · 17 to <21
- Expected goals (xG) · 2 appearances ago ≤ 0.121
- Form across teams · Minutes played · previous 5 average ≤ 94.4
Scenario discovery · 3/6
3 successes in 6 appearances used to find these conditions. This result selected the scenario; it is not its validation.
Consistency over time · varying effect
The same rule, unchanged between periods. These subsets are not independent confirmations.
Scenario 3Unconfirmed
- Kickoff hour (Paris) · 17 to <21
- Expected goals (xG) · 2 appearances ago ≤ 0.121
- Goals · 2 appearances ago ≤ 0
Scenario discovery · 3/6
3 successes in 6 appearances used to find these conditions. This result selected the scenario; it is not its validation.
Consistency over time · varying effect
The same rule, unchanged between periods. These subsets are not independent confirmations.
At least 1 shot on target
Historical reference · awaiting the next fixture
Where does he deliver?
FC St. Pauli · Match season · 2026-08-23 → 2026-09-28
Dot: observed success · Band: 95% uncertainty. Odds ±0.10 · Defence ±20% (minimum ±0.25 goals). Historical outcomes; groups may overlap.
Polonia
Goals conceded per game. Overall includes friendlies. Home/Away refers to Poland. Competition: UEFA Nations League, League B, Gr. 4. Team Odd: the player’s team win price, within ±0.10. Bars relative to the daily maximum.
His general tendencies
Observed history, not a guarantee for the next match. Trends can share the same games.
See evidence and results
Model index, not a measured hit rate. Scenarios and rhythm describe overlapping history; their percentages are not added together.
At least 1 shot on target
Had at least 1 shot on target in 0 of 2 appearances
Playing time → chances → outcomes
Last 5 appearance averages compared with earlier ones. These are observations, not projected next-match minutes.
How precise is this sample? · 2 appearances
The observed rate of 0% has an uncertainty interval of 0–66%. Small samples leave a wider margin. This is not the probability of the next match.
His record at comparable odds
Same team, decimal odds within ±10% of the input quote. Scorer odds remain scorer odds, including on the assist tab. Historical frequencies, not a next-match probability.
Conditions to assess
Conditions found in his own history, then checked on later appearances. Failures are included.
All conditions in one scenario must hold together. Scenarios describe the same player; do not add their successes together. Start with its later results, then compare other contexts over the same period. Strong discovery results alone are insufficient.
Scenario 1Unconfirmed
- Venue · Home
- Form across teams · Goals · previous 5 average ≤ 0
- Kickoff hour (Paris) · 17 to <21
- Form across teams · Minutes played · previous 5 average ≤ 94.4
Scenario discovery · 4/5
4 successes in 5 appearances used to find these conditions. This result selected the scenario; it is not its validation.
Consistency over time · too few cases
The same rule, unchanged between periods. These subsets are not independent confirmations.
Scenario 2Unconfirmed
- Form across teams · Minutes played · previous 5 average ≤ 90
- Kickoff hour (Paris) · 17 to <21
- Player: Goals per 90, previous 10 appearances · 0 to <0.2
Scenario discovery · 5/8
5 successes in 8 appearances used to find these conditions. This result selected the scenario; it is not its validation.
Consistency over time · varying effect
The same rule, unchanged between periods. These subsets are not independent confirmations.
Scenario 3Unconfirmed
- Form across teams · Minutes played · previous 5 average ≤ 94.4
- Kickoff hour (Paris) · 17 to <21
- Form across teams · Goals · previous 5 average ≤ 0
Scenario discovery · 5/8
5 successes in 8 appearances used to find these conditions. This result selected the scenario; it is not its validation.
Consistency over time · too few cases
The same rule, unchanged between periods. These subsets are not independent confirmations.
Fixture, opposition and data used
Chances or finishing?
Compare his last 5 appearances with earlier ones. Shots and xG describe opportunities; goals and assists show the outcome.
His rhythm, match by match
Oldest to latest. Swipe through appearances.
Last appearance · all measurements · 0
Match inputs
Inputs the engine can compare. Availability alone is not a favourable signal.
Team win · 2.02
2 available indicatorsHistory: 33/66 appearances with at least one measurement in this family116 rest days
16 available indicatorsHistory: 66/66 appearances with at least one measurement in this familyDisplayed odds come from the engine's input snapshot. Physical load describes past appearances.
Player learning history · 66 appearances
Club and country inform his form. Their scoring rates stay distinct; other teams cannot overwhelm the current context.
