Wout Weghorst
Balance del jugador


Datos del perfil: SofaScore
Wout Weghorst
His historical profile. Next-match context appears when the fixture is known.
History: rolling 12 months for club, country and their patterns. Match analyses stop before the studied fixture; current streaks follow the latest available completed games.
→ 36 appearances studied
→ 4 appearances studied
→ 6 appearances studied
At least one goal
Observed frequencies over 12 months. Yes/no tendencies and their occurrences appear in the patterns below.
Países Bajos
Serbia
Wout Weghorst’s tendencies
Leading pattern · Does not score 5/5 · <2 goals conceded / game · last 5 Personal observation
Frequencies describe previous games. Cards based on the same games are not independent evidence.
How patterns are ranked
Team odds, opposition defence, venue and player sequences are compared over 12 months. Sample size, differences from other games and consistency across periods determine the order. Other players provide an additional comparison; missing peer evidence does not hide personal cases.
One or two previous cases are shown as very small samples for a current context, without determining the main tendency. A retained combination must add information beyond either condition alone. A high hit rate may still resemble the usual rate. Negative differences and later-period results are also shown. This does not establish causation or betting profitability.
Simple patterns · Scores
<2 goals conceded / game · last 5
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 9 of the 13 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
Other readings of the same games+
At home
Does not score
View 5 games+
In the previous game: <3 shots
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 16 of the 36 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
Other readings of the same games+
<1 shots on target
<2 shots on target
Does not score
Does not score
View 6 games+
In the previous game: <0.3 xG
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 3 of the 13 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 5 games+
1–<1.5 team win odds
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 11 of the 32 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 3 games+
View all 6 tendencies
<2 goals conceded / game · same venue
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 1 of the 2 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 2 games+
1.5–<2 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 2 of the 11 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 1 games+
Conditions not met
0–<1 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 23 of the 38 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 4 games+
→ 36 appearances studied
→ 4 appearances studied
→ 6 appearances studied
At least one assist
Observed frequencies over 12 months. Yes/no tendencies and their occurrences appear in the patterns below.
Países Bajos
Serbia
Wout Weghorst’s tendencies
Leading pattern · No assist 6/6 · In the previous game: <3 shots Personal recurrence
Frequencies describe previous games. Cards based on the same games are not independent evidence.
How patterns are ranked
Team odds, opposition defence, venue and player sequences are compared over 12 months. Sample size, differences from other games and consistency across periods determine the order. Other players provide an additional comparison; missing peer evidence does not hide personal cases.
One or two previous cases are shown as very small samples for a current context, without determining the main tendency. A retained combination must add information beyond either condition alone. A high hit rate may still resemble the usual rate. Negative differences and later-period results are also shown. This does not establish causation or betting profitability.
Simple patterns · Assists
In the previous game: <3 shots
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 14 of the 36 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
Other readings of the same games+
<1 shots on target
<2 shots on target
<0.2 xA
<1 shots on target
No assist
No assist
View 6 games+
<2 goals conceded / game · last 5
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 5 of the 13 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
Other readings of the same games+
At home
No assist
View 5 games+
In the previous game: <0.3 xG
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 6 of the 13 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 5 games+
1–<1.5 team win odds
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 13 of the 32 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 3 games+
View all 6 tendencies
<2 goals conceded / game · same venue
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 0 of the 2 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 2 games+
1.5–<2 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 2 of the 11 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 1 games+
Conditions not met
0–<1 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 20 of the 38 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 4 games+
→ 36 appearances studied
→ 4 appearances studied
→ 6 appearances studied
A goal or an assist
Observed frequencies over 12 months. Yes/no tendencies and their occurrences appear in the patterns below.
Países Bajos
Serbia
Wout Weghorst’s tendencies
Leading pattern · Neither goal nor assist 5/5 · <2 goals conceded / game · last 5 Personal observation
Frequencies describe previous games. Cards based on the same games are not independent evidence.
How patterns are ranked
Team odds, opposition defence, venue and player sequences are compared over 12 months. Sample size, differences from other games and consistency across periods determine the order. Other players provide an additional comparison; missing peer evidence does not hide personal cases.
One or two previous cases are shown as very small samples for a current context, without determining the main tendency. A retained combination must add information beyond either condition alone. A high hit rate may still resemble the usual rate. Negative differences and later-period results are also shown. This does not establish causation or betting profitability.
Simple patterns · Goal / assist
<2 goals conceded / game · last 5
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 10 of the 13 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
Other readings of the same games+
At home
Neither goal nor assist
View 5 games+
In the previous game: <3 shots
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 14 of the 36 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
Other readings of the same games+
<1 shots on target
<2 shots on target
<0.2 xA
Neither goal nor assist
Neither goal nor assist
View 6 games+
In the previous game: <0.3 xG
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 3 of the 13 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 5 games+
1–<1.5 team win odds
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 14 of the 32 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 3 games+
View all 6 tendencies
<2 goals conceded / game · same venue
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 1 of the 2 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 2 games+
1.5–<2 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 2 of the 11 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 1 games+
Conditions not met
0–<1 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 25 of the 38 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 4 games+
→ 36 appearances studied
→ 4 appearances studied
→ 6 appearances studied
At least 2 shots
Observed frequencies over 12 months. Yes/no tendencies and their occurrences appear in the patterns below.
Países Bajos
Serbia
Wout Weghorst’s tendencies
Recent form · Last 5 games
- ○Fewer than 2 shotsPaíses Bajos
- ○Fewer than 2 shotsPaíses Bajos
- ○Fewer than 2 shotsPaíses Bajos
- ○Fewer than 2 shotsPaíses Bajos
- ○Fewer than 2 shotsPaíses Bajos
- ○Fewer than 2 shotsPaíses Bajos
- ○Fewer than 2 shotsFC Twente
- ○Fewer than 2 shotsFC Twente
- ○Fewer than 2 shotsFC Twente
- ●2+ shotsFC Twente
Leading pattern · Fewer than 2 shots 6/6 · In the previous game: <2 shots on target Personal recurrence
Frequencies describe previous games. Cards based on the same games are not independent evidence.
How patterns are ranked
Team odds, opposition defence, venue and player sequences are compared over 12 months. Sample size, differences from other games and consistency across periods determine the order. Other players provide an additional comparison; missing peer evidence does not hide personal cases.
One or two previous cases are shown as very small samples for a current context, without determining the main tendency. A retained combination must add information beyond either condition alone. A high hit rate may still resemble the usual rate. Negative differences and later-period results are also shown. This does not establish causation or betting profitability.
Simple patterns · Shots
In the previous game: <2 shots on target
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 18 of the 30 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
Other readings of the same games+
<3 shots
<1 shots on target
Fewer than 2 shots
Fewer than 2 shots
View 6 games+
After 3 games · Fewer than 2 shots
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 5 of the 7 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
Other readings of the same games+
<2 goals conceded / game · last 5
At home
View 5 games+
In the previous game: <1 shots
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 11 of the 19 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
Other readings of the same games+
<0.3 xG
View 5 games+
1–<1.5 team win odds
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 9 of the 32 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 3 games+
View all 6 tendencies
<2 goals conceded / game · same venue
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 1 of the 2 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 2 games+
1.5–<2 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 2 of the 11 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 1 games+
Conditions not met
0–<1 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 25 of the 38 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 4 games+
→ 36 appearances studied
→ 4 appearances studied
→ 6 appearances studied
At least 1 shot on target
Observed frequencies over 12 months. Yes/no tendencies and their occurrences appear in the patterns below.
Países Bajos
Serbia
Wout Weghorst’s tendencies
Recent form · Last 5 games
- ○No shot on targetPaíses Bajos
- ○No shot on targetPaíses Bajos
- ○No shot on targetPaíses Bajos
- ○No shot on targetPaíses Bajos
- ○No shot on targetPaíses Bajos
- ○No shot on targetPaíses Bajos
- ○No shot on targetFC Twente
- ●Shot on targetFC Twente
- ○No shot on targetFC Twente
- ●Shot on targetFC Twente
Leading pattern · No shot on target 5/5 · <2 goals conceded / game · last 5 Personal observation
Frequencies describe previous games. Cards based on the same games are not independent evidence.
How patterns are ranked
Team odds, opposition defence, venue and player sequences are compared over 12 months. Sample size, differences from other games and consistency across periods determine the order. Other players provide an additional comparison; missing peer evidence does not hide personal cases.
One or two previous cases are shown as very small samples for a current context, without determining the main tendency. A retained combination must add information beyond either condition alone. A high hit rate may still resemble the usual rate. Negative differences and later-period results are also shown. This does not establish causation or betting profitability.
Simple patterns · On target
<2 goals conceded / game · last 5
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 9 of the 13 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
Other readings of the same games+
No shot on target
At home
View 5 games+
In the previous game: <3 shots
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 12 of the 36 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
Other readings of the same games+
<1 shots on target
<2 shots on target
No shot on target
No shot on target
View 6 games+
In the previous game: <0.3 xG
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 5 of the 13 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 5 games+
1–<1.5 team win odds
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 8 of the 32 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 3 games+
View all 6 tendencies
<2 goals conceded / game · same venue
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 1 of the 2 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 2 games+
1.5–<2 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 3 of the 11 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 1 games+
Conditions not met
0–<1 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players+
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 22 of the 38 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context+
View 4 games+
His rhythm, match by match ·
Países Bajos
Latest 6 appearances within 12 months (up to 25), oldest to latest. Goal colours match the histogram.