Roman Yaremchuk
Bilancio stagionale del giocatore
Dati del profilo: SofaScore
Roman Yaremchuk
His historical profile. Next-match context appears when the fixture is known.
History: rolling 12 months for club, country and their patterns. Match analyses stop before the studied fixture; current streaks follow the latest available completed games.
Olympiacos FCClub
Olympique LyonnaisCountryUcraina→ 31 appearances studied
Olympiacos FC→ 12 appearances studied
Ucraina→ 5 appearances studied
At least one goal
Observed frequencies over 12 months. Yes/no tendencies and their occurrences appear in the patterns below.
Ucraina
Ungheria
Roman Yaremchuk’s tendencies
Leading pattern · Does not score 4/4 · In the previous game: <3 shots Personal observation
Frequencies describe previous games. Cards based on the same games are not independent evidence.
How patterns are ranked
Team odds, opposition defence, venue and player sequences are compared over 12 months. Sample size, differences from other games and consistency across periods determine the order. Other players provide an additional comparison; missing peer evidence does not hide personal cases.
One or two previous cases are shown as very small samples for a current context, without determining the main tendency. A retained combination must add information beyond either condition alone. A high hit rate may still resemble the usual rate. Negative differences and later-period results are also shown. This does not establish causation or betting profitability.
Simple patterns · Scores
Conditions metIn the previous game: <3 shots
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 16 of the 37 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
Other readings of the same games＋
Does not score
View 4 games＋
Conditions met<2 goals conceded / game · last 5
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 11 of the 14 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 3 games＋
Conditions metAt home
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 17 of the 46 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 3 games＋
Conditions metIn the previous game: <1 shots on target
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 17 of the 38 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
Other readings of the same games＋
<2 shots on target
<0.3 xG
View 3 games＋
View all 7 tendencies
Conditions metAfter 2 games · Does not score
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 16 of the 36 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 3 games＋
Conditions met0–<1 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 22 of the 37 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
Other readings of the same games＋
<2 goals conceded / game · same venue
View 2 games＋
Conditions met2–<3 team win odds
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 5 of the 14 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 1 games＋
Conditions not met
Conditions not met≥3 team win odds
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 15 of the 19 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 3 games＋
Conditions not met≥2 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 4 of the 8 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 3 games＋
Olympiacos FCClubOlympique LyonnaisCountryUcraina→ 31 appearances studied
Olympiacos FC→ 12 appearances studied
Ucraina→ 5 appearances studied
At least one assist
Observed frequencies over 12 months. Yes/no tendencies and their occurrences appear in the patterns below.
Ucraina
Ungheria
Roman Yaremchuk’s tendencies
Leading pattern · No assist 4/4 · In the previous game: <3 shots Personal observation
Frequencies describe previous games. Cards based on the same games are not independent evidence.
How patterns are ranked
Team odds, opposition defence, venue and player sequences are compared over 12 months. Sample size, differences from other games and consistency across periods determine the order. Other players provide an additional comparison; missing peer evidence does not hide personal cases.
One or two previous cases are shown as very small samples for a current context, without determining the main tendency. A retained combination must add information beyond either condition alone. A high hit rate may still resemble the usual rate. Negative differences and later-period results are also shown. This does not establish causation or betting profitability.
Simple patterns · Assists
Conditions metIn the previous game: <3 shots
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 13 of the 37 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
Other readings of the same games＋
<0.2 xA
No assist
View 4 games＋
Conditions met<2 goals conceded / game · last 5
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 5 of the 14 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 3 games＋
Conditions metAt home
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 20 of the 46 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 3 games＋
Conditions metIn the previous game: <1 shots on target
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 13 of the 38 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
Other readings of the same games＋
<2 shots on target
<0.3 xG
<1 shots on target
View 3 games＋
View all 7 tendencies
Conditions metAfter 2 games · No assist
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 11 of the 31 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 3 games＋
Conditions met0–<1 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 20 of the 37 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
Other readings of the same games＋
<2 goals conceded / game · same venue
View 2 games＋
Conditions met2–<3 team win odds
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 5 of the 14 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 1 games＋
Conditions not met
Conditions not met≥2 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 1 of the 8 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 3 games＋
Conditions not met≥3 team win odds
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 6 of the 19 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 3 games＋
Olympiacos FCClubOlympique LyonnaisCountryUcraina→ 31 appearances studied
Olympiacos FC→ 12 appearances studied
Ucraina→ 5 appearances studied
A goal or an assist
Observed frequencies over 12 months. Yes/no tendencies and their occurrences appear in the patterns below.
Ucraina
Ungheria
Roman Yaremchuk’s tendencies
Leading pattern · Neither goal nor assist 4/4 · In the previous game: <3 shots Personal observation
Frequencies describe previous games. Cards based on the same games are not independent evidence.
How patterns are ranked
Team odds, opposition defence, venue and player sequences are compared over 12 months. Sample size, differences from other games and consistency across periods determine the order. Other players provide an additional comparison; missing peer evidence does not hide personal cases.
One or two previous cases are shown as very small samples for a current context, without determining the main tendency. A retained combination must add information beyond either condition alone. A high hit rate may still resemble the usual rate. Negative differences and later-period results are also shown. This does not establish causation or betting profitability.
Simple patterns · Goal / assist
Conditions metIn the previous game: <3 shots
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 13 of the 37 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
Other readings of the same games＋
<0.2 xA
Neither goal nor assist
View 4 games＋
Conditions met<2 goals conceded / game · last 5
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 11 of the 14 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 3 games＋
Conditions metAt home
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 19 of the 46 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 3 games＋
Conditions metIn the previous game: <1 shots on target
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 16 of the 38 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
Other readings of the same games＋
<2 shots on target
<0.3 xG
View 3 games＋
View all 7 tendencies
Conditions metAfter 2 games · Neither goal nor assist
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 14 of the 28 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 3 games＋
Conditions met0–<1 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 25 of the 37 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
Other readings of the same games＋
<2 goals conceded / game · same venue
View 2 games＋
Conditions met2–<3 team win odds
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 5 of the 14 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 1 games＋
Conditions not met
Conditions not met≥3 team win odds
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 14 of the 19 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 3 games＋
Conditions not met≥2 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
Close to his usual rate. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 4 of the 8 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 3 games＋
Olympiacos FCClubOlympique LyonnaisCountryUcraina→ 31 appearances studied
Olympiacos FC→ 12 appearances studied
Ucraina→ 5 appearances studied
At least 2 shots
Observed frequencies over 12 months. Yes/no tendencies and their occurrences appear in the patterns below.
Ucraina
Ungheria
Roman Yaremchuk’s tendencies
Recent form · Last 5 games
Ucraina5 games- ○Fewer than 2 shotsUcraina
- ●2+ shotsUcraina
- ○Fewer than 2 shotsUcraina
- ○Fewer than 2 shotsUcraina
- ○Fewer than 2 shotsUcraina
- ●2+ shotsOlympique Lyonnais
- ○Fewer than 2 shotsOlympique Lyonnais
- ●2+ shotsOlympiacos FC
- ○Fewer than 2 shotsUcraina
- ○Fewer than 2 shotsUcraina
Leading pattern · Fewer than 2 shots 3/4 · In the previous game: <3 shots Personal observation
Frequencies describe previous games. Cards based on the same games are not independent evidence.
How patterns are ranked
Team odds, opposition defence, venue and player sequences are compared over 12 months. Sample size, differences from other games and consistency across periods determine the order. Other players provide an additional comparison; missing peer evidence does not hide personal cases.
One or two previous cases are shown as very small samples for a current context, without determining the main tendency. A retained combination must add information beyond either condition alone. A high hit rate may still resemble the usual rate. Negative differences and later-period results are also shown. This does not establish causation or betting profitability.
Simple patterns · Shots
Conditions metIn the previous game: <3 shots
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 18 of the 37 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 4 games＋
Conditions met<2 goals conceded / game · last 5
Less frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 6 of the 14 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 3 games＋
Conditions metAt home
Less frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 19 of the 46 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 3 games＋
Conditions metIn the previous game: <1 shots on target
Less frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 17 of the 38 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
Other readings of the same games＋
<2 shots on target
<0.3 xG
Fewer than 2 shots
View 3 games＋
View all 6 tendencies
Conditions met0–<1 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 25 of the 37 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
Other readings of the same games＋
<2 goals conceded / game · same venue
View 2 games＋
Conditions met2–<3 team win odds
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 7 of the 14 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 1 games＋
Conditions not met
Conditions not met≥3 team win odds
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 11 of the 19 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 3 games＋
Conditions not met≥2 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
Less frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 4 of the 8 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 3 games＋
Olympiacos FCClubOlympique LyonnaisCountryUcraina→ 31 appearances studied
Olympiacos FC→ 12 appearances studied
Ucraina→ 5 appearances studied
At least 1 shot on target
Observed frequencies over 12 months. Yes/no tendencies and their occurrences appear in the patterns below.
Ucraina
Ungheria
Roman Yaremchuk’s tendencies
Recent form · Last 5 games
Ucraina5 games- ○No shot on targetUcraina
- ●Shot on targetUcraina
- ○No shot on targetUcraina
- ○No shot on targetUcraina
- ○No shot on targetUcraina
- ○No shot on targetOlympique Lyonnais
- ○No shot on targetOlympique Lyonnais
- ●Shot on targetOlympiacos FC
- ○No shot on targetUcraina
- ○No shot on targetUcraina
Leading pattern · No shot on target 3/4 · In the previous game: <3 shots Personal observation
Frequencies describe previous games. Cards based on the same games are not independent evidence.
How patterns are ranked
Team odds, opposition defence, venue and player sequences are compared over 12 months. Sample size, differences from other games and consistency across periods determine the order. Other players provide an additional comparison; missing peer evidence does not hide personal cases.
One or two previous cases are shown as very small samples for a current context, without determining the main tendency. A retained combination must add information beyond either condition alone. A high hit rate may still resemble the usual rate. Negative differences and later-period results are also shown. This does not establish causation or betting profitability.
Simple patterns · On target
Conditions metIn the previous game: <3 shots
Not enough games outside this context. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 13 of the 37 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 4 games＋
Conditions met<2 goals conceded / game · last 5
Less frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 9 of the 14 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 3 games＋
Conditions metAt home
Less frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 16 of the 46 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 3 games＋
Conditions metIn the previous game: <1 shots on target
Less frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 14 of the 38 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
Other readings of the same games＋
<2 shots on target
<0.3 xG
No shot on target
View 3 games＋
View all 6 tendencies
Conditions met<2 goals conceded / game · same venue
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 1 of the 2 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
Other readings of the same games＋
0–<1 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
View 2 games＋
Conditions met2–<3 team win odds
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 8 of the 14 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 1 games＋
Conditions not met
Conditions not met≥3 team win odds
More frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 14 of the 19 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 3 games＋
Conditions not met≥2 goals conceded / game · last 10 at most
Less frequent than in his other games. Historical frequencies.
Consistency and other players＋
The outcome shown above, in the later part of the history.
For 3 of the 8 comparable players, this outcome is more frequent with this condition than without it.
Compare with context＋
View 3 games＋
His rhythm, match by match · Ucraina
Latest 5 appearances within 12 months (up to 25), oldest to latest. Goal colours match the histogram.
