SEO Match Summary
Austin FC secured a 1–0 victory over DC United in MLS action on 1 March, dominating possession and creating significantly more attacking opportunities. The hosts controlled the match through their 4–2–3–1 formation, registering 18 shots with 9 on target and accumulating 1.49 expected goals, whilst DC United managed only 7 shots and 2 on target from a 4–4–2 setup, generating just 0.26 xG. Christian Ramirez converted one of Austin's chances to settle the contest. Austin's goalkeeper proved decisive, making a 88.89 per cent save percentage and preventing 1.51 goals above expected, demonstrating the visitors' inability to capitalise on their limited opportunities. The performance underscored Austin's attacking threat and defensive solidity. Austin's efficiency in front of goal extends their unbeaten run at home.
A
Austin FC
D
DC United
Expected Goals (xG)
1.49
0.26
Shots
18
7
Shots on Target
9
2
Possession
54%
46%
Post-Shot xG Faced
0.10
2.51
Goals Saved Above xG
+0.10
+1.51
Yellow Cards
3
3
Corners
10
4
Total Goals1
Formation4-2-3-1vs4-4-2
Goalkeeper Performance
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Austin FC GK
PSxG conceded0.10
Goals conceded0
Goals saved0.10
Save %100.0%
DC United GK
PSxG conceded2.51
Goals conceded1
Goals saved1.51
Save %88.9%
DC United's keeper stopped about 1.5 goals more than an average keeper would, while Austin FC's keeper performed right in line with expectations.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot
