Austin FC drew 1-1 with Philadelphia Union in MLS, as Austin’s 3-4-3 generated territorial control but Philadelphia’s compact 4-4-2 and resilient goalkeeping kept the contest level. Brendan Hines-Ike scored for the hosts, while Cavan Sullivan supplied the Union’s goal. Austin held 55% possession and produced 12 shots, compared with Philadelphia’s nine, but the clearest distinction came in accuracy and goalkeeper performance. The hosts placed six attempts on target, twice Philadelphia’s total, yet the Union goalkeeper recorded an 83.33% save rate and saved 0.55 goals above post-shot expectations. Austin’s broader shape offered width and helped sustain pressure, while Philadelphia’s two banks of four limited the damage and provided a platform for their front pairing. The underlying chances were relatively close: Austin finished with 1.27 xG and Philadelphia with 0.99, supporting a scoreline that reflected a competitive balance despite the hosts’ greater possession and shooting volume. Austin’s goalkeeper faced three shots on target and made two saves, leaving both sides with a point under referee Rodrigo Albuquerque. The draw preserves a closely matched head-to-head picture.
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Austin FC GK
PSxG conceded1.04
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.04
Save %66.7%
Philadelphia Union GK
PSxG conceded1.55
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.55
Save %83.3%
Philadelphia Union's keeper stopped about 0.6 goal more than an average keeper would, while Austin FC's keeper performed right in line with expectations.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot