Return to calendar
Sunday, September 27, 2026

Austin FCOpen full analysisSan Diego FCOpen full analysis

MLS 12.71X3.6422.38
SEO Match Summary
Austin FC and San Diego FC finished level at 3-3 in this MLS fixture played on 2026-09-27. The shot count was 13 for Austin FC and 15 for San Diego FC. Possession finished at 41.0 percent against 59.0 percent. Expected goals were 1.58 for the home side and 2.22 for the visitors. The starting shapes were 3-4-3 and 3-4-3. The final score, attacking indicators, discipline, goalkeeper data and visual comparison are detailed below. The figures provide a factual account of the completed match and do not turn the recap into a prediction. The Football dashboard retains the interactive filters, team histories and season views for deeper analysis.
Austin FC A Austin FC
3 – 3
Draw
San Diego FC S San Diego FC
Christian Ramirez ×2
Marcus Ingvartsen
Expected Goals (xG) 1.58 2.22
Shots 13 15
Shots on Target 6 5
Possession 41% 59%
Post-Shot xG Faced 0.64 2.21
Yellow Cards 1 0
Total Goals6
Formation3-4-3vs3-4-3
Goalkeeper Performance

Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.

Austin FC GK
PSxG conceded0.64
Goals conceded3
Goals saved-2.36
Save %40.0%
San Diego FC GK
PSxG conceded2.21
Goals conceded3
Goals saved-0.79
Save %50.0%
San Diego FC's keeper let in roughly 0.8 goal more than an average keeper would, while Austin FC's keeper had a night to forget.

Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.

Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot