Sporting Kansas City's clinical finishing proved decisive as they secured a 2-1 victory over Austin FC in an MLS encounter that reflected a significant quality gap in chance conversion. The visitors dominated proceedings with 20 shots to Austin's eight, translating their superiority into an expected goals advantage of 1.52 to 0.37. Kansas City's eight shots on target demonstrated ruthless efficiency, with Manu Garcia and Stephen Afrifa each finding the net, while Austin managed just three efforts on goal despite operating in a 4-4-2 formation that offered defensive stability. Austin's goalkeeper struggled to contain the onslaught, recording a save percentage of 66.67 and conceding 0.91 goals above expected, indicating vulnerable positioning on Kansas City's second strike. The hosts' attacking threat remained peripheral throughout, their low xG output suggesting limited opportunities to trouble Kansas City's backline. This result underscores Kansas City's current momentum in the league.
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Austin FC GK
PSxG conceded2.35
Goals conceded2
Goals saved0.35
Save %75.0%
Sporting Kansas City GK
PSxG conceded0.91
Goals conceded1
Goals saved-0.09
Save %66.7%
Both keepers had a routine night, with little to separate them.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot