Cagliari beat Arezzo 1-0 in the Coppa Italia, prevailing despite conceding territory to a 4-3-3 side that held 58% possession. Cagliari’s 4-2-3-1 prioritised defensive structure and selective attacks, producing 15 shots to Arezzo’s 18, while both teams registered three efforts on target. The decisive margin came through Cagliari’s ability to protect their goal: their goalkeeper saved all three shots on target faced for a 100% save rate. At the other end, Arezzo’s goalkeeper recorded a 66.67% save percentage from Cagliari’s three on-target attempts, leaving the visitors unable to recover after the single concession. Arezzo controlled more of the ball and matched Cagliari on target, but Cagliari’s defensive resilience defined the tie. Arezzo’s possession did not alter the result.
CCagliari
1–0
Full Time
AArezzo
Shots1518
Shots on Target33
Possession42%58%
Yellow Cards22
Total Goals1
Formation4-2-3-1vs4-3-3
Goalkeeper Performance
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Cagliari GK
PSxG conceded0.00
Goals conceded0
Goals saved0.00
Save %100.0%
Arezzo GK
PSxG conceded–
Goals conceded1
Save %66.7%
Cagliari's keeper performed right in line with expectations, while Arezzo's keeper kept out 67% of the shots on target.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot