Return to calendar
Sunday, September 27, 2026

CF MontrealOpen full analysisFC CincinnatiOpen full analysis

MLS 12.78X3.7422.28
SEO Match Summary
CF Montreal defeated FC Cincinnati 3-1 in this MLS fixture played on 2026-09-27. The shot count was 15 for CF Montreal and 18 for FC Cincinnati. Possession finished at 45.0 percent against 55.0 percent. Expected goals were 2.15 for the home side and 2.04 for the visitors. The starting shapes were 3-4-1-2 and 3-5-2. The final score, attacking indicators, discipline, goalkeeper data and visual comparison are detailed below. The figures provide a factual account of the completed match and do not turn the recap into a prediction. The Football dashboard retains the interactive filters, team histories and season views for deeper analysis.
CF Montreal C CF Montreal
3 – 1
Full Time
FC Cincinnati F FC Cincinnati
Prince Owusu ×2Daniel Rios
Tom Barlow
Expected Goals (xG) 2.15 2.04
Shots 15 18
Shots on Target 5 4
Possession 45% 55%
Post-Shot xG Faced 1.83 2.56
Goals Saved Above xG +0.83 -0.44
Yellow Cards 2 2
Total Goals4
Formation3-4-1-2vs3-5-2
Goalkeeper Performance

Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.

CF Montreal GK
PSxG conceded1.83
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.83
Save %75.0%
FC Cincinnati GK
PSxG conceded2.56
Goals conceded3
Goals saved-0.44
Save %40.0%
CF Montreal's keeper stopped about 0.8 goal more than an average keeper would, while FC Cincinnati's keeper let in roughly 0.4 goal more than an average keeper would.

Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.

Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot