Philadelphia Union claimed a 2-1 victory at CF Montreal in MLS action, exploiting their dominance in open play to secure three points. The visitors controlled the contest through a direct 4-4-2 shape, registering 15 shots compared to Montreal's seven, with six efforts on target to the hosts' four. Despite comparable expected goals—Philadelphia's 1.07 to Montreal's 0.96—the Union's clinical finishing proved decisive, with Jesus Bueno and Japhet Sery Larsen finding the net. Montreal's Ivan Jaime responded with a goal, but it proved insufficient to prevent defeat. Philadelphia's goalkeeper made a modest contribution, posting a 66.67 per cent save percentage whilst facing 2.21 post-shot expected goals conceded, though marginally outperforming that metric. Montreal's 4-2-3-1 defensive setup offered little resistance to the Union's width and intensity. The result underscores Philadelphia's growing threat in the Eastern Conference.
CCF Montreal
1–2
Full Time
PPhiladelphia Union
I. Jaime23'E. Morales23'
J. Sery Larsen55'J. Bueno70'M. Iloski55'E. Alladoh70'
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
CF Montreal GK
PSxG conceded2.21
Goals conceded2
Goals saved0.21
Save %66.7%
Philadelphia Union GK
PSxG conceded1.80
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.80
Save %75.0%
Philadelphia Union's keeper stopped about 0.8 goal more than an average keeper would, while CF Montreal's keeper performed right in line with expectations.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot