Charlotte FC and FC Cincinnati played out a 2–2 draw in MLS action on 10 May, with the hosts' superior expected goals (2.01 xG versus 1.44) offset by Cincinnati's clinical finishing and shot volume. Charlotte's 4–2–3–1 setup generated quality chances through Idan Toklomati and Pep Biel, who each scored, yet they managed only three shots on target from twelve attempts. Cincinnati's three-at-the-back formation proved more efficient in front of goal, with Kevin Denkey and Evander finding the net despite a lower xG tally; the visitors also registered five shots on target from thirteen total efforts. Cincinnati's goalkeeper faced a save percentage of 60 per cent and conceded 1.75 post-shot expected goals, suggesting some wayward finishing from Charlotte in the final third. Referee Ismail Elfath oversaw a match that reflected both sides' attacking intent but neither's defensive solidity. The draw leaves both teams searching for consistency in the regular season.
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Charlotte FC GK
PSxG conceded1.75
Goals conceded2
Goals saved-0.25
Save %60.0%
FC Cincinnati GK
PSxG conceded1.30
Goals conceded2
Goals saved-0.70
Save %33.3%
Charlotte FC's keeper performed right in line with expectations, while FC Cincinnati's keeper let in roughly 0.7 goal more than an average keeper would.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot