Charlotte FC defeated New England Revolution 1–0 in an MLS encounter where the hosts' superior attacking efficiency proved decisive. Operating in a 4-2-3-1 formation, Charlotte dominated the quality metrics despite facing a Revolution side that matched their shot count at 13 attempts. The hosts generated 2.02 expected goals from six shots on target, converting one through Idan Toklomati, while New England's 0.73 xG from three shots on target underscored their wastefulness in front of goal. The Revolution's goalkeeper delivered a commanding performance with a 100 per cent save percentage and 0.74 goals saved above expected, yet it proved insufficient to salvage a point. Referee Fotis Bazakos oversaw a competitive fixture where Charlotte's clinical finishing ultimately separated the sides. Victory consolidates Charlotte's position as New England seeks to arrest their recent struggles.
CCharlotte FC
1–0
Full Time
NNew England Revolution
I. Toklomati16'W. Cleary16'
Starting Line-ups
Charlotte FC · 4-2-3-1New England Revolution · 4-2-3-1
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Charlotte FC GK
PSxG conceded0.74
Goals conceded0
Goals saved0.74
Save %100.0%
New England Revolution GK
PSxG conceded1.91
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.91
Save %83.3%
New England Revolution's keeper stopped about 0.9 goal more than an average keeper would, while Charlotte FC's keeper stopped about 0.7 goal more than an average keeper would.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot