SEO Match Summary
Atlanta United advanced past Chattanooga FC in the US Open Cup with a commanding 3–1 victory on the road, dominating the encounter through superior shot volume and clinical finishing. The visitors, operating in a 4-3-3 shape, peppered Chattanooga's goal with 17 shots, of which six found the target, while the hosts managed only four attempts with two on target from their 4-2-3-1 formation. Fafa Picault opened the scoring for Atlanta, who controlled the tie through sustained attacking pressure despite Chattanooga's goalkeeper keeping the deficit manageable with a 50% save percentage. The home side's custodian conceded 1.0 post-shot expected goals above their actual goals conceded, indicating Chattanooga created minimal clear-cut opportunities in a defensive display that proved insufficient against the MLS side's efficiency. Atlanta's progression reflects their superior depth and attacking capability in cup competition.
C
Chattanooga FC
A
Atlanta United
Expected Goals (xG)
0.46
2.00
Shots
4
17
Shots on Target
2
6
Possession
32%
68%
Yellow Cards
1
2
Total Goals4
Formation4-2-3-1vs4-3-3
Goalkeeper Performance
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Chattanooga FC GK
PSxG conceded–
Goals conceded3
Save %50.0%
Atlanta United GK
PSxG conceded1.00
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.00
Save %50.0%
Chattanooga FC's keeper kept out 50% of the shots on target, while Atlanta United's keeper performed right in line with expectations.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot