Return to calendar
Saturday, February 28, 2026

Chicago FireOpen full analysisCF MontrealOpen full analysis

MLS 11.54X4.3425.41
SEO Match Summary
Chicago Fire dominated CF Montreal with a comprehensive 3-0 victory in MLS action, controlling the match through sustained attacking pressure from their 4-3-3 formation. The hosts generated 17 shots with 11 on target, translating their 3.05 expected goals into three clinical finishes, with Hugo Cuypers, Robin Lod, and Jonathan Bamba each finding the net. Montreal's 4-2-3-1 setup offered minimal resistance, mustering just four shots and 0.1 xG, leaving their goalkeeper with few meaningful saves to make. Chicago's goalkeeper registered a 72.73 per cent save rate and gained 2.08 goals above expected value, though his team's defensive dominance meant Montreal rarely tested him. The disparity in shot volume and quality underscored Fire's superiority across the pitch, with Montreal unable to construct meaningful attacking opportunities despite their compact midfield setup. This emphatic home performance signals strong early-season form for Chicago ahead of their next fixture.
Chicago Fire C Chicago Fire
3 0
Full Time
CF Montreal C CF Montreal
H. Cuypers90+4'J. Bamba27'R. Lod90+10'
Starting Line-ups
Chicago Fire · 4-3-3 CF Montreal · 4-2-3-1
Tap a player for name & stats ·  goal   assist
Expected Goals (xG) 3.05 0.10
Shots 17 4
Shots on Target 11 2
Possession 44% 56%
Post-Shot xG Faced 0.07 5.08
Goals Saved Above xG +0.07 +2.08
Yellow Cards 1 3
Red Cards 1 0
Corners 9 3
Total Goals3
Formation4-3-3vs4-2-3-1
Goalkeeper Performance

Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.

Chicago Fire GK
PSxG conceded0.07
Goals conceded0
Goals saved0.07
Save %100.0%
CF Montreal GK
PSxG conceded5.08
Goals conceded3
Goals saved2.08
Save %72.7%
CF Montreal's keeper was outstanding, while Chicago Fire's keeper performed right in line with expectations.

Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.

Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot