Return to calendar
Sunday, August 2, 2026

Chicago FireOpen full analysisCharlotte FCOpen full analysis

MLS 11.51X4.5025.41
SEO Match Summary
Chicago Fire secured a 2–1 victory over Charlotte FC in MLS action, with Robert Lewandowski's brace proving decisive despite the hosts' modest xG of 1.62. Charlotte dominated possession at 54 per cent and matched Chicago's 14 shots, but converted only one from their five on-target efforts, with Pep Biel's goal insufficient to salvage a point. The Fire's 4–4–2 shape proved pragmatic; they controlled the ball less frequently but generated cleaner chances, while Charlotte's 4–3–3 setup created volume without clinical finishing. Chicago's goalkeeper benefited from fortunate positioning, conceding 0.49 xG whilst facing fewer clear-cut opportunities. Charlotte's shot-stopper made three saves from five on-target attempts (60 per cent save rate) but could not prevent Lewandowski's clinical finishing. Fire's efficiency in a low-possession game underscores their threat on the counter. Victory consolidates Chicago's mid-season momentum against a Charlotte side struggling for consistency.
Chicago Fire C Chicago Fire
2 – 1
Full Time
Charlotte FC C Charlotte FC
R. Lewandowski20', 68' P. Zinckernagel20'R. Lod68'
P. Biel18' I. Toklomati18'
Starting Line-ups
Chicago Fire · 4-4-2 Charlotte FC · 4-3-3
Tap a player for name & stats ·  goal   assist
Expected Goals (xG) 1.62 0.83
Shots 14 14
Shots on Target 5 1
Possession 46% 54%
Post-Shot xG Faced 0.49 1.59
Yellow Cards 3 0
Corners 8 6
Total Goals3
Formation4-4-2vs4-3-3
Goalkeeper Performance

Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.

Chicago Fire GK
PSxG conceded0.49
Goals conceded1
Goals saved-0.51
Save %0.0%
Charlotte FC GK
PSxG conceded1.59
Goals conceded2
Goals saved-0.41
Save %60.0%
Charlotte FC's keeper let in roughly 0.4 goal more than an average keeper would, while Chicago Fire's keeper let in roughly 0.5 goal more than an average keeper would.

Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.

Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot