Return to calendar
Thursday, September 10, 2026

Chicago FireOpen full analysisInter Miami CFOpen full analysis

MLS 12.30X4.1022.58
SEO Match Summary
Chicago Fire and Inter Miami CF finished level at 1-1 in this MLS fixture played on 2026-09-10. The shot count was 10 for Chicago Fire and 20 for Inter Miami CF. Possession finished at 44.0 percent against 56.0 percent. Expected goals were 0.83 for the home side and 1.37 for the visitors. The starting shapes were 4-4-2 and 4-3-1-2. The final score, attacking indicators, discipline, goalkeeper data and visual comparison are detailed below. The figures provide a factual account of the completed match and do not turn the recap into a prediction. The Football dashboard retains the interactive filters, team histories and season views for deeper analysis.
Chicago Fire C Chicago Fire
1 1
Draw
Inter Miami CF I Inter Miami CF
Robert Lewandowski
Casemiro
Expected Goals (xG) 0.83 1.37
Shots 10 20
Shots on Target 3 7
Possession 44% 56%
Post-Shot xG Faced 2.00 0.85
Goals Saved Above xG +1.00 -0.15
Yellow Cards 2 3
Total Goals2
Formation4-4-2vs4-3-1-2
Goalkeeper Performance

Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.

Chicago Fire GK
PSxG conceded2.00
Goals conceded1
Goals saved1.00
Save %85.7%
Inter Miami CF GK
PSxG conceded0.85
Goals conceded1
Goals saved-0.15
Save %66.7%
Chicago Fire's keeper stopped about 1.0 goal more than an average keeper would, while Inter Miami CF's keeper performed right in line with expectations.

Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.

Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot