Chicago Fire secured a narrow 1-0 victory over Nashville SC in an MLS encounter where both sides adopted identical 4-4-2 formations but the hosts' clinical finishing proved decisive. Philip Zinckernagel's solitary goal separated the teams, though the underlying metrics reveal a closely contested match. Chicago generated marginally superior expected goals at 1.18 compared to Nashville's 0.79, yet both sides registered ten shots apiece, with the visitors actually managing four shots on target to the Fire's three. Chicago's goalkeeper proved influential, posting a 66.67 per cent save percentage and recording 0.11 goals saved above expected goals, suggesting competent shot-stopping prevented a levelled scoreline. The decisive margin came from efficiency rather than dominance, as Chicago converted limited clear-cut opportunities whilst Nashville's superior shot accuracy failed to translate into goals. This result consolidates Chicago's position whilst Nashville must address their conversion rate moving forward.
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Chicago Fire GK
PSxG conceded1.14
Goals conceded0
Goals saved1.14
Save %100.0%
Nashville SC GK
PSxG conceded1.11
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.11
Save %66.7%
Chicago Fire's keeper stopped about 1.1 goal more than an average keeper would, while Nashville SC's keeper performed right in line with expectations.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot