Return to calendar
Monday, August 10, 2026

Chicago FireOpen full analysisSantos LagunaOpen full analysis

Leagues Cup, Group Stage 11.49X4.6325.38
SEO Match Summary
Chicago Fire dominated Santos Laguna 3–1 in a Leagues Cup Group Stage encounter, controlling proceedings with 66 per cent possession and creating a clear attacking advantage. The hosts' 4-3-3 setup proved effective against Santos Laguna's 4-2-3-1, with Fire generating 2.83 expected goals from 25 shots, of which six found the target. Philip Zinckernagel and Robin Lod each scored once for the home side, with a third goal securing a comfortable victory. Santos Laguna offered limited resistance, managing only eight shots and 0.88 xG, though they did find the net once. Chicago Fire's goalkeeper made three saves from six shots on target faced, maintaining a 66.67 per cent save percentage to keep the deficit at one goal conceded. The disparity in shot volume—25 to eight—underscored Fire's dominance throughout the match. Fire's attacking efficiency and defensive solidity position them well in the group stage.
Chicago Fire C Chicago Fire
3 – 1
Full Time
Santos Laguna S Santos Laguna
Philip ZinckernagelRobin Lod
Shots 25 8
Shots on Target 6 3
Possession 66% 34%
Yellow Cards 2 3
Total Goals4
Formation4-3-3vs4-2-3-1
Goalkeeper Performance

Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.

Chicago Fire GK
PSxG conceded1.00
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.00
Save %66.7%
Santos Laguna GK
PSxG conceded3.00
Goals conceded3
Goals saved0.00
Save %50.0%
Both keepers had a routine night, with little to separate them.

Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.

Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot