Chile secured a 2-1 victory over Peru in an International Friendly on 11 October, dominating proceedings through superior shot volume and expected goals. Operating in a 4-3-3 formation, the hosts fired 19 shots with six reaching the target, generating 1.63 xG against Peru's modest 0.32 xG from ten attempts. Chile's control was evident in their ability to create quality chances, though their goalkeeper faced just three shots on target and maintained a 66.67 per cent save rate while conceding 2.0 post-shot expected goals. Peru's 4-3-3setup offered little threat in the final third, registering only two shots on target in a performance that reflected the gulf in attacking potency. The disparity between expected goals and actual scoreline—Chile overperforming their xG while Peru underperforming—suggests the home side's clinical finishing proved decisive. This friendly result underscores Chile's attacking depth ahead of upcoming qualifiers.
CChile
2–1
Full Time
PPeru
B. Brereton Díaz63'M. Gutiérrez90+4'V. Pizarro63'G. Tapia90+4'
C. Inga40'J. Castillo40'
Starting Line-ups
Chile · 4-3-3Peru · 4-3-3
Tap a player for name & stats · goalassist
Expected Goals (xG)1.630.32
Shots1910
Shots on Target62
Possession64%36%
Yellow Cards22
Corners53
Total Goals3
Formation4-3-3vs4-3-3
Goalkeeper Performance
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Chile GK
PSxG conceded1.00
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.00
Save %50.0%
Peru GK
PSxG conceded2.00
Goals conceded2
Goals saved0.00
Save %66.7%
Both keepers had a routine night, with little to separate them.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot