Colorado Rapids defeated Portland Timbers 2-0 in MLS action, dominating through superior attacking efficiency and defensive solidity. The Rapids' 4-3-3 setup proved more effective than Portland's 4-2-3-1, with Colorado generating 24 shots to the Timbers' 12 whilst maintaining a cleaner defensive shape. Despite an expected goals differential of just 0.68 (1.79 to 1.11), the Rapids converted their chances with Lucas Herrington and Hamzat Ojediran finding the net. Colorado's goalkeeper made nine saves at a 77.78 per cent success rate, though the underlying metrics suggest the defence restricted Portland to low-quality opportunities; the visitors managed only three shots on target. Portland's inability to create clear-cut chances proved costly, with their 4-2-3-1 midfield configuration failing to generate the attacking impetus needed against a well-organised Rapids side. The performance underlines Colorado's improving form and defensive resilience. Rapids' efficiency suggests sustainable momentum in the Western Conference race.
CColorado Rapids
2–0
Full Time
PPortland Timbers
L. Herrington53'H. Ojediran6'J. Travis6'D. Sealy53'
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Colorado Rapids GK
PSxG conceded0.70
Goals conceded0
Goals saved0.70
Save %100.0%
Portland Timbers GK
PSxG conceded2.37
Goals conceded2
Goals saved0.37
Save %77.8%
Colorado Rapids's keeper stopped about 0.7 goal more than an average keeper would, while Portland Timbers's keeper performed right in line with expectations.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot