Return to calendar
Thursday, August 20, 2026

Columbus CrewOpen full analysisCF MontrealOpen full analysis

MLS 11.68X3.9824.54
SEO Match Summary
CF Montreal beat Columbus Crew 2-1 in MLS, using their direct 4-3-3 structure to overcome the hosts’ greater share of possession. Columbus had 62% of the ball in a 4-4-2 but produced only six shots, with two on target, while Montreal registered 14 attempts and tested the home goalkeeper seven times. The visitors’ attacking advantage was also reflected in the underlying figures: Montreal generated 1.16 xG compared with Columbus’s 0.3. Thomas Gillier and Prince Owusu scored the Montreal goals, giving their side the decisive edge despite operating with only 38% possession. Columbus’s goalkeeper recorded a 71.43% save rate from seven shots on target faced, limiting the damage as Montreal repeatedly found opportunities through their front three. At the opposite end, Montreal’s goalkeeper faced two efforts on target and posted a 50% save rate, with the Crew finding one goal but too little sustained threat to overturn the visitors’ sharper attacking output. Montreal claim the latest head-to-head advantage.
Columbus Crew C Columbus Crew
1 2
Full Time
CF Montreal C CF Montreal
P. Owusu5'N. Streit78' B. Vera78'H. Synchuk5'
Starting Line-ups
Columbus Crew · 4-4-2 CF Montreal · 4-3-3
Tap a player for name & stats ·  goal   assist
Expected Goals (xG) 0.30 1.16
Shots 6 14
Shots on Target 2 7
Possession 62% 38%
Post-Shot xG Faced 1.74 0.20
Yellow Cards 2 4
Corners 5 3
Total Goals3
Formation4-4-2vs4-3-3
Goalkeeper Performance

Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.

Columbus Crew GK
PSxG conceded1.74
Goals conceded2
Goals saved-0.26
Save %71.4%
CF Montreal GK
PSxG conceded0.20
Goals conceded1
Goals saved-0.80
Save %50.0%
Columbus Crew's keeper performed right in line with expectations, while CF Montreal's keeper let in roughly 0.8 goal more than an average keeper would.

Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.

Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot