New England Revolution won 3-1 at Columbus Crew in MLS, using a compact 4-1-4-1 structure to turn fewer possessions into sustained attacking pressure. Columbus held 55.0% of the ball in their 4-4-2 but produced only seven shots, with one on target and 0.44 xG, while New England generated 21 attempts, 11 on target and 1.35 xG from 45.0% possession. Dor Turgeman, Matt Polster and Carles Gil each scored once for the visitors, with Brais Mendez replying for Columbus. The shot volume reflected New England’s ability to progress into dangerous areas and test the home goalkeeper repeatedly; Columbus’s keeper faced 11 shots on target, recorded a 72.73% save rate and finished 0.85 goals below expected saved. New England’s goalkeeper conceded once from a 0.19 post-shot xG faced, while Columbus could not translate their territorial share into enough clear chances. Jon Freemon oversaw a contest defined by New England’s sharper work in both penalty areas. New England take three valuable away points.
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Columbus Crew GK
PSxG conceded2.15
Goals conceded3
Goals saved-0.85
Save %72.7%
New England Revolution GK
PSxG conceded0.19
Goals conceded1
Goals saved-0.81
Save %0.0%
New England Revolution's keeper let in roughly 0.8 goal more than an average keeper would, while Columbus Crew's keeper let in roughly 0.8 goal more than an average keeper would.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot