Return to calendar
Thursday, September 10, 2026

ComoOpen full analysisRB LeipzigOpen full analysis

UEFA Champions League 11.68X4.1724.61
SEO Match Summary
Como defeated RB Leipzig 4-1 in this UEFA Champions League fixture played on 2026-09-10. The shot count was 14 for Como and 14 for RB Leipzig. Possession finished at 51.0 percent against 49.0 percent. Expected goals were 2.98 for the home side and 1.36 for the visitors. The final score, attacking indicators, discipline, goalkeeper data and visual comparison are detailed below. The figures provide a factual account of the completed match and do not turn the recap into a prediction. The Football dashboard retains the interactive filters, team histories and season views for deeper analysis.
Como C Como
4 1
Full Time
RB Leipzig R RB Leipzig
Maximo PerroneAssane DiaoAnastasios DouvikasMartin Baturina
Andrija Maksimovic
Expected Goals (xG) 2.98 1.36
Shots 14 14
Shots on Target 6 4
Possession 51% 49%
Post-Shot xG Faced 1.46 2.42
Yellow Cards 2 3
Total Goals5
Goalkeeper Performance

Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.

Como GK
PSxG conceded1.46
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.46
Save %75.0%
RB Leipzig GK
PSxG conceded2.42
Goals conceded4
Goals saved-1.58
Save %33.3%
Como's keeper stopped about 0.5 goal more than an average keeper would, while RB Leipzig's keeper let in roughly 1.6 goals more than an average keeper would.

Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.

Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot