Cruz Azul defeated New York City FC 2–1 in the Leagues Cup Group Stage, dominating possession and creating a clear attacking advantage. The hosts controlled 59 per cent of the ball and generated 2.17 expected goals from 20 shots, with six efforts on target, while NYCFC managed only 0.87 xG from eight shots. Cruz Azul's 5–3–2 formation proved effective defensively, limiting the visitors to three shots on target; their goalkeeper made three saves at a 66.67 per cent save rate. NYCFC's 4–2–3–1 setup struggled to generate sufficient attacking threat despite their goalkeeper also achieving a 66.67 per cent save rate across six shots faced. The visitors' post-shot expected goals conceded of 2.0 underscores the quality of chances they surrendered, and they failed to capitalise on limited opportunities. Cruz Azul's victory strengthens their group-stage credentials through superior control and clinical finishing.
CCruz Azul
2–1
Full Time
NNew York City FC
A. Palavecino35'J. Paradela78'E. Lira35'C. Rodríguez78'
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Cruz Azul GK
PSxG conceded–
Goals conceded1
Save %66.7%
New York City FC GK
PSxG conceded2.00
Goals conceded2
Goals saved0.00
Save %66.7%
Cruz Azul's keeper kept out 67% of the shots on target, while New York City FC's keeper performed right in line with expectations.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot