Return to calendar
Saturday, September 12, 2026

Crystal PalaceOpen full analysisIpswich TownOpen full analysis

Premier League 12.16X3.7123.21
SEO Match Summary
Ipswich Town defeated Crystal Palace 3-2 in this Premier League fixture played on 2026-09-12. The shot count was 11 for Crystal Palace and 12 for Ipswich Town. Possession finished at 47.0 percent against 53.0 percent. Expected goals were 0.62 for the home side and 1.67 for the visitors. The starting shapes were 3-4-2-1 and 4-2-3-1. The final score, attacking indicators, discipline, goalkeeper data and visual comparison are detailed below. The figures provide a factual account of the completed match and do not turn the recap into a prediction. The Football dashboard retains the interactive filters, team histories and season views for deeper analysis.
Crystal Palace C Crystal Palace
2 3
Full Time
Ipswich Town I Ipswich Town
Jorgen Strand LarsenAnan Khalaili
EmersonnLeif Davis
Expected Goals (xG) 0.62 1.67
Shots 11 12
Shots on Target 4 6
Possession 47% 53%
Post-Shot xG Faced 3.67 0.51
Yellow Cards 1 3
Red Cards 1 0
Total Goals5
Formation3-4-2-1vs4-2-3-1
Goalkeeper Performance

Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.

Crystal Palace GK
PSxG conceded3.67
Goals conceded3
Goals saved0.67
Save %50.0%
Ipswich Town GK
PSxG conceded0.51
Goals conceded2
Goals saved-1.49
Save %50.0%
Crystal Palace's keeper stopped about 0.7 goal more than an average keeper would, while Ipswich Town's keeper let in roughly 1.5 goal more than an average keeper would.

Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.

Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot