CS Maritimo drew 2-2 with Academico Viseu FC in Liga Portugal Betclic, as the hosts’ 4-2-3-1 controlled slightly more possession while Viseu’s 4-3-3 carried the greater attacking threat. Maritimo had 53% of the ball, but the visitors recorded 1.84 xG compared with the home side’s 1.28, reflecting their more productive use of transitions and width. Viseu also led 7-4 in shots on target, despite facing 11 attempts and producing 13 themselves. Soufiane Messeguem and Andre Clovis scored for Academico Viseu, while Adrian Butzke and Paulo Henrique supplied Maritimo’s goals. The contrast between Maritimo’s territorial edge and Viseu’s superior chance profile defined the contest, with the visitors finding more frequent routes into shooting positions while the hosts remained effective enough inside the penalty area to match their two-goal return. Neither formation secured decisive control, leaving Luis Carlos Mateus Filipe to oversee an evenly balanced scoreline shaped by different attacking approaches. Both sides therefore take a point from the contest.
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
CS Maritimo GK
PSxG conceded1.87
Goals conceded2
Goals saved-0.13
Save %71.4%
Academico Viseu FC GK
PSxG conceded1.04
Goals conceded2
Goals saved-0.96
Save %50.0%
CS Maritimo's keeper performed right in line with expectations, while Academico Viseu FC's keeper let in roughly 1.0 goal more than an average keeper would.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot