CS Maritimo claimed a 1–0 victory over Casa Pia in Liga Portugal Betclic, capitalising on clinical finishing despite controlling just 39 per cent possession. The hosts, deployed in a 4–2–3–1 formation, generated 1.28 xG from 16 shots and converted their sole chance, whilst their goalkeeper made a perfect 100 per cent save rate, shutting out all four attempts Casa Pia directed on target. Casa Pia dominated proceedings with 61 per cent possession and registered 0.64 xG, but their 4–3–3 setup failed to break through; their goalkeeper saved 75 per cent of shots faced, keeping the deficit narrow despite the hosts' efficiency. The visitors' xG underperformance—conceding 1.88 xG whilst allowing only one goal—suggests they defended relatively well, yet Maritimo's ruthlessness in transition proved decisive. Maritimo's counter-attacking approach proved more effective than Casa Pia's possession-based strategy.
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
CS Maritimo GK
PSxG conceded0.44
Goals conceded0
Goals saved0.44
Save %100.0%
Casa Pia GK
PSxG conceded1.88
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.88
Save %75.0%
Casa Pia's keeper stopped about 0.9 goal more than an average keeper would, while CS Maritimo's keeper stopped about 0.4 goal more than an average keeper would.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot