Inter Miami CF secured a 2-1 victory over DC United in MLS action on 7 March, capitalising on clinical finishing despite being significantly outshot. DC United dominated possession and territory, registering 15 shots with an expected goals tally of 1.6, yet managed only three efforts on target through their 4-2-3-1 setup. Inter Miami, operating in a compact 4-1-3-2 formation, absorbed pressure effectively and converted their limited opportunities with ruthless efficiency, with Rodrigo de Paul and Lionel Messi finding the net. The visitors' goalkeeper proved decisive, recording a 50 per cent save percentage whilst conceding just 0.8 post-shot expected goals, suggesting strong shot-stopping despite the team's defensive vulnerability in underlying metrics. Tai Baribo's goal proved insufficient for the hosts, who created chances but lacked the cutting edge to punish Miami's defensive frailty. Inter Miami's counter-attacking approach proved more effective than DC United's dominant but imprecise attacking play. Miami's efficiency in front of goal underscores their ability to win without controlling proceedings.
DDC United
1–2
Full Time
IInter Miami CF
T. Baribo75'
R. De Paul17'L. Messi27'T. Segovia17'M. Silvetti27'
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
DC United GK
PSxG conceded0.80
Goals conceded2
Goals saved-1.20
Save %50.0%
Inter Miami CF GK
PSxG conceded1.13
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.13
Save %66.7%
Inter Miami CF's keeper performed right in line with expectations, while DC United's keeper let in roughly 1.2 goal more than an average keeper would.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot