Detroit City FC fell to Chicago Fire 2–1 in the US Open Cup on 15 April, despite dominating possession and creating more chances. The hosts pressed aggressively in a 4-2-3-1 formation, registering 15 shots with 2 on target, but their goalkeeper's 50 per cent save rate highlighted the clinical nature of the visitors' finishing. Chicago's 4-3-3 setup proved devastatingly efficient in transition, converting 3 of just 6 shots into two goals. Detroit's goalkeeper conceded 1.0 post-shot expected goals and made no saves above expectation, indicating the Fire's shots were well-placed and difficult to stop. The disparity between shot volume and conversion rate proved decisive; Detroit's inability to capitalise on their territorial advantage cost them progression in the competition.
DDetroit City FC
1–2
Full Time
CChicago Fire
D. Smith79'H. Yamazaki79'
J. Shokalook34', 36'D. Poreba36'P. Zinckernagel34'
Starting Line-ups
Detroit City FC · 4-2-3-1Chicago Fire · 4-3-3
Tap a player for name & stats · goalassist
Expected Goals (xG)1.250.80
Shots156
Shots on Target23
Possession47%53%
Yellow Cards23
Red Cards01
Corners42
Total Goals3
Formation4-2-3-1vs4-3-3
Goalkeeper Performance
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Detroit City FC GK
PSxG conceded–
Goals conceded2
Save %33.3%
Chicago Fire GK
PSxG conceded1.00
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.00
Save %50.0%
Detroit City FC's keeper kept out 33% of the shots on target, while Chicago Fire's keeper performed right in line with expectations.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot