FC Augsburg beat Energie Cottbus 2-0 in the DFB-Pokal, with their 3-4-2-1 structure overcoming the hosts’ greater share of possession and sustained attacking output. Cottbus operated in a 4-2-3-1 and held 60% of the ball, but Augsburg’s compact shape and efficiency proved decisive in a match where the underlying numbers were closely balanced. The visitors recorded 2.32 xG from 20 shots, while Cottbus generated 2.16 xG from 21 attempts, showing that the scoreline did not fully reflect the home side’s opportunities. Anton Kade scored one of Augsburg’s two goals, providing the clearest attacking contribution listed for the Bundesliga club. Goalkeeping also separated the teams: Augsburg’s goalkeeper saved all six shots on target for a 100% save rate, whereas Cottbus faced seven efforts on target and registered a 71.43% save percentage. Augsburg’s wing-back system offered enough defensive coverage to withstand pressure while maintaining a threat through their two supporting attackers, allowing them to manage the tie despite having only 40% possession. Augsburg advance with an efficient and defensively secure cup performance.
EEnergie Cottbus
0–2
Full Time
FFC Augsburg
A. Kade49'K. Jakić90+5'M. Gregoritsch49'R. Ribeiro90+5'
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Energie Cottbus GK
PSxG conceded–
Goals conceded2
Save %71.4%
FC Augsburg GK
PSxG conceded0.00
Goals conceded0
Goals saved0.00
Save %100.0%
Energie Cottbus's keeper kept out 71% of the shots on target, while FC Augsburg's keeper performed right in line with expectations.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot