FC Cincinnati overwhelmed Orlando City SC 6–2 in an MLS encounter where the hosts' superior clinical finishing proved decisive despite comparable shot volumes. Both sides adopted 3–4–2–1 formations, but Cincinnati capitalised on their chances with ruthless efficiency, converting 11 of 21 shots on target while generating 3.58 expected goals. Orlando mustered 19 shots of their own, registering 9 on target with 2.15 xG, yet their execution faltered when it mattered. Kenji Mboma Dem and Evander each scored twice for Cincinnati, supplemented by Tom Barlow and Kevin Denkey, while Martin Ojeda's brace provided Orlando's sole attacking consolation. Cincinnati's goalkeeper endured a difficult afternoon, posting a 45.45 per cent save percentage and conceding 5.88 post-shot expected goals, suggesting the visitors created genuine opportunities despite the scoreline's severity. The gulf in clinical finishing underscored Cincinnati's current potency in the attacking third. This victory signals Cincinnati's ascendancy in the Eastern Conference standings.
FFC Cincinnati
6–2
Full Time
OOrlando City SC
K. M. Dem42', 52'Evander45+3', 58'K. Denkey77'T. Barlow90+1'M. Miazga58'P. Bucha45+3'Evander42', 52', 77'E. Echenique90+1'
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
FC Cincinnati GK
PSxG conceded2.54
Goals conceded2
Goals saved0.54
Save %77.8%
Orlando City SC GK
PSxG conceded5.88
Goals conceded6
Goals saved-0.12
Save %45.5%
FC Cincinnati's keeper stopped about 0.5 goal more than an average keeper would, while Orlando City SC's keeper performed right in line with expectations.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot