Frosinone beat Juve Stabia 4-1 in the Coppa Italia, turning a relatively balanced contest into a decisive victory through sharper finishing and greater control in key areas. Both sides used a 4-3-3, but Frosinone made better use of their width and attacking numbers, producing 22 shots while limiting Juve Stabia to 17. The hosts held 54% possession and recorded 2.41 xG, compared with Juve Stabia’s 1.89, underlining that the five-goal scoreline was more emphatic than the underlying chance quality suggested. Each team registered seven shots on target, making the difference in execution especially clear: Frosinone converted four of theirs, whereas Juve Stabia scored once. Goalkeeping also influenced the margin, with Frosinone’s keeper posting an 85.71% save rate from seven efforts on target, while the visiting goalkeeper saved 42.86% of the seven attempts faced. Referee Maco Di Loreto oversaw a match in which Frosinone’s superior penalty-box efficiency ultimately separated two teams operating with similar structures and comparable attacking output. Frosinone advance with a convincing early-season cup result.
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Frosinone GK
PSxG conceded1.00
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.00
Save %85.7%
Juve Stabia GK
PSxG conceded–
Goals conceded4
Save %42.9%
Frosinone's keeper performed right in line with expectations, while Juve Stabia's keeper kept out 43% of the shots on target.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot