Return to calendar
Monday, August 24, 2026

FulhamOpen full analysisChelseaOpen full analysis

Premier League
SEO Match Summary
Chelsea beat Fulham 3-2 in the Premier League, using their direct attacking structure to overcome the hosts’ greater control of the ball. Fulham’s patient possession game gave them 62% of the ball, but Chelsea’s more vertical approach produced 2.24 xG compared with the home side’s 1.33. Operating with wing-backs and two narrow creators behind the striker, Chelsea found space around Fulham’s midfield pairing and carried a consistent threat during transitions. Cole Palmer, João Pedro and Morgan Rogers supplied the visitors’ goals, underlining the range of attacking options available within their system. Fulham remained competitive through Joshua King and Gonzalo Garcia, whose goals ensured Chelsea could not manage the contest comfortably despite creating the stronger chances overall. The hosts’ territorial advantage allowed them to sustain pressure, yet Chelsea were more effective when advancing into decisive areas and ultimately turned that efficiency into a narrow victory. The contrasting approaches defined the match: Fulham sought control through circulation, while Chelsea accepted less of the ball in exchange for sharper progression and greater attacking output. Chelsea take the early-season head-to-head advantage.
Fulham F Fulham
2 3
Full Time
Chelsea C Chelsea
Joshua KingGonzalo Garcia
Cole PalmerJoao PedroMorgan Rogers
Expected Goals (xG) 1.33 2.24
Shots 14 18
Shots on Target 6 6
Possession 62% 38%
Post-Shot xG Faced 2.02 1.17
Yellow Cards 2 3
Total Goals5
Formation4-2-3-1vs3-4-2-1
Goalkeeper Performance

Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.

Fulham GK
PSxG conceded2.02
Goals conceded3
Goals saved-0.98
Save %50.0%
Chelsea GK
PSxG conceded1.17
Goals conceded2
Goals saved-0.83
Save %66.7%
Chelsea's keeper let in roughly 0.8 goal more than an average keeper would, while Fulham's keeper let in roughly 1.0 goal more than an average keeper would.

Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.

Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot