Return to calendar
Thursday, April 30, 2026

Houston DynamoOpen full analysisLouisville City FCOpen full analysis

US Open Cup
SEO Match Summary
Houston Dynamo advanced in the US Open Cup with a 2–1 victory over Louisville City FC, dominating the shot count to secure their passage. The hosts deployed a 3-5-2 formation that proved effective in creating chances, firing 22 shots with 10 on target against Louisville's more conservative 3-4-3 setup, which managed only 12 shots and four on target. Ezequiel Ponce and Erik Sviatchenko scored the goals that carried Houston through, while Louisville's goalkeeper maintained a 75 per cent save percentage in a losing effort. The visitors' keeper was credited with no shots saved above expected goals, suggesting Houston's opportunities were relatively clear-cut. Dynamo's attacking width and numerical advantage in midfield overwhelmed a Louisville side that struggled to generate sufficient attacking pressure despite their three-man defence. Houston's cup credentials strengthen with this convincing home performance.
Houston Dynamo H Houston Dynamo
2 1
Full Time
Louisville City FC L Louisville City FC
Erik SviatchenkoEzequiel Ponce
Shots 22 12
Shots on Target 10 4
Possession 71% 29%
Yellow Cards 2 3
Total Goals3
Formation3-5-2vs3-4-3
Goalkeeper Performance

Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.

Houston Dynamo GK
PSxG conceded1.00
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.00
Save %75.0%
Louisville City FC GK
PSxG conceded
Goals conceded2
Save %80.0%
Houston Dynamo's keeper performed right in line with expectations, while Louisville City FC's keeper kept out 80% of the shots on target.

Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.

Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot