Hungary defeated Finland 2–1 in an International Friendly on 5 June, with the hosts controlling proceedings through a 4–2–3–1 setup that dominated shot creation despite modest underlying metrics. Hungary registered 18 shots compared to Finland's 11, though their expected goals of 1.0 suggested clinical finishing rather than overwhelming dominance; Finland's 4–3–3 formation generated four shots on target from 0.72 xG, indicating greater efficiency in chance conversion. The visitors' goalkeeper performed adequately with a 75 per cent save percentage, conceding 1.0 post-shot expected goals, though Hungary's direct approach ultimately proved decisive. Referee Ante Culina oversaw a competitive encounter that saw the home side's greater shot volume translate into victory. Hungary's attacking intent in midfield proved the difference in a match where both sides created limited high-quality opportunities.
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Hungary GK
PSxG conceded1.00
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.00
Save %75.0%
Finland GK
PSxG conceded2.00
Goals conceded2
Goals saved0.00
Save %0.0%
Both keepers had a routine night, with little to separate them.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot