Return to calendar
Thursday, July 23, 2026

Inter Miami CFOpen full analysisChicago FireOpen full analysis

MLS 12.50X3.9922.42
SEO Match Summary
Inter Miami CF defeated Chicago Fire 3–2 in an MLS encounter that hinged on clinical finishing and defensive vulnerabilities. The hosts dominated proceedings with 53 per cent possession and seven shots on target from 14 attempts, converting chances with ruthless efficiency despite an expected goals tally of 2.32. Luis Suárez proved decisive with two goals, while Rocco Rios Novo added the third. Chicago pressed aggressively in a 4–4–2 shape, registering 15 shots but managed only four on target, yielding 2.89 expected goals conceded—a stark illustration of their wastefulness in the final third. Inter Miami's goalkeeper made a save percentage of 50 per cent from four shots faced, though the underlying metrics suggest defensive frailty; Chicago's stopper kept the scoreline respectable with a 57.14 per cent save rate despite facing seven shots on target. The result underscores Miami's clinical edge in a competitive fixture. Miami's attacking prowess suggests sustained playoff credentials.
Inter Miami CF I Inter Miami CF
3 2
Full Time
Chicago Fire C Chicago Fire
L. Suárez27', 51'P. Plambeck87' G. Berterame51'
P. Dithejane67' M. Haile-Selassie67'
Starting Line-ups
Inter Miami CF · 4-2-2-2 Chicago Fire · 4-4-2
Tap a player for name & stats ·  goal   assist
Expected Goals (xG) 2.32 1.85
Shots 14 15
Shots on Target 7 4
Possession 53% 47%
Post-Shot xG Faced 1.00 2.89
Yellow Cards 1 1
Corners 8 4
Total Goals5
Formation4-2-2-2vs4-4-2
Goalkeeper Performance

Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.

Inter Miami CF GK
PSxG conceded1.00
Goals conceded2
Goals saved-1.00
Save %50.0%
Chicago Fire GK
PSxG conceded2.89
Goals conceded3
Goals saved-0.11
Save %57.1%
Chicago Fire's keeper performed right in line with expectations, while Inter Miami CF's keeper let in roughly 1.0 goal more than an average keeper would.

Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.

Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot