Toronto FC beat Inter Miami CF 2-1 in MLS, succeeding with a compact 4-2-3-1 shape and a clinical counter-attacking approach against Miami’s more expansive 4-3-2-1. Inter controlled 62% of possession and generated 1.83 xG, compared with Toronto’s 0.51, but the visitors made better use of their limited opportunities. Lionel Messi scored Miami’s goal, while Josh Sargent and Derrick Etienne supplied Toronto’s decisive finishes. Both teams recorded three shots on target, although Miami attempted 10 shots overall to Toronto’s seven. Goalkeeping performance also contributed to the outcome: Toronto’s goalkeeper posted a 66.67% save rate, twice Miami’s 33.33%, while the hosts conceded two goals from three efforts on target. Miami’s territorial control and stronger underlying attacking output therefore counted for little against opponents who protected central areas and punished transitions efficiently. Toronto’s shape provided sufficient defensive cover without preventing Sargent and Etienne from attacking the spaces left by Miami’s forward movement. The result gives Toronto a valuable away win over an MLS rival.
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Inter Miami CF GK
PSxG conceded0.50
Goals conceded2
Goals saved-1.50
Save %33.3%
Toronto FC GK
PSxG conceded0.85
Goals conceded1
Goals saved-0.15
Save %66.7%
Toronto FC's keeper performed right in line with expectations, while Inter Miami CF's keeper let in roughly 1.5 goals more than an average keeper would.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot