Equatorial Guinea secured a 1–0 victory over Kyrgyzstan in an International Friendly on 25 March 2026, claiming all three points despite minimal shot data recorded for either side. Kyrgyzstan set up in a 4–4–1–1 formation but failed to register a single shot throughout the match, while Equatorial Guinea operated in a 4–1–4–1 shape and found the decisive goal without registering shots on target in the available record. The absence of detailed shooting metrics and possession figures limits tactical analysis, though the result underscores Equatorial Guinea's clinical finishing in a low-volume encounter. Kyrgyzstan's inability to create clear-cut opportunities proved costly in a closely contested friendly fixture. Equatorial Guinea's efficiency in converting limited chances demonstrates their threat on the counter.
KKyrgyzstan
0–1
Full Time
EEquatorial Guinea
Total Goals1
Formation4-4-1-1vs4-1-4-1
Goalkeeper Performance
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Kyrgyzstan GK
PSxG conceded–
Goals conceded1
Equatorial Guinea GK
PSxG conceded0.00
Goals conceded0
Goals saved0.00
Equatorial Guinea's keeper performed right in line with expectations.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot