Leeds United beat FC Augsburg 4-0 in the Club Friendly Games, turning an even share of possession into a decisive pre-season win. Both sides used a 3-4-2-1 shape and finished with 50.0% possession, but Leeds carried the clearer attacking threat, posting 2.57 xG to Augsburg’s 0.29. The four-goal margin exceeded Leeds’ expected-goals return, while Augsburg’s goalkeeper conceded four from a post-shot xG against of 4.0. With no scorer information available, the result and underlying chance quality provide the clearest account of Leeds’ superiority: they restricted Augsburg to low-value opportunities and found the clinical edge required to separate the teams. Leeds begin their preparations with emphatic momentum.
LLeeds United
4–0
Full Time
FFC Augsburg
Expected Goals (xG)2.570.29
Possession50%50%
Yellow Cards01
Total Goals4
Formation3-4-2-1vs3-4-2-1
Goalkeeper Performance
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Leeds United GK
PSxG conceded0.00
Goals conceded0
Goals saved0.00
FC Augsburg GK
PSxG conceded4.00
Goals conceded4
Goals saved0.00
Both keepers had a routine night, with little to separate them.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot
