Lithuania and Malta drew 1-1 in a World Cup qualifying fixture that saw both sides cancel each other out despite similar territorial control. Playing in matching 4-2-3-1 formations, the teams generated comparable attacking threat, with Lithuania recording 1.61 expected goals from 14 shots (four on target) while Malta accumulated a marginally higher 2.06 xG from an identical shot count of 14, though only three found the target. Malta's goalkeeper maintained a 66.67% save percentage and conceded 1.0 post-shot xG, suggesting solid shot-stopping despite the goal conceded. The deadlock reflects neither side's ability to convert limited clear-cut opportunities into decisive advantage, with both teams cancelling each other out in midfield. The result leaves both nations searching for wins in a competitive group stage where points prove decisive.
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Lithuania GK
PSxG conceded1.00
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.00
Save %66.7%
Malta GK
PSxG conceded–
Goals conceded1
Save %75.0%
Lithuania's keeper performed right in line with expectations, while Malta's keeper kept out 75% of the shots on target.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot