Louisville City FC advanced in the US Open Cup with a 2–1 victory over Austin FC, despite being outshot 16–14 by their visiting opponents. The hosts' 3-4-3 formation proved more clinical in front of goal, with seven shots on target compared to Austin's three, reflecting superior conversion efficiency. Louisville's goalkeeper made seven saves at a 71.43% save rate, conceding 2.0 post-shot expected goals and matching that total in actual goals conceded—a neutral performance that nonetheless proved sufficient. Austin dominated the shot count but struggled to create quality chances, their 16 attempts yielding minimal threat on target. Both teams deployed identical 3-4-3 shapes, yet Louisville's compactness and transitional play proved decisive in a cagey cup tie. The result keeps Louisville's domestic cup hopes alive heading into the next round.
LLouisville City FC
2–1
Full Time
AAustin FC
S. Totsch26'T. Showunmi32'M. Perez32'T. Davila26'
C. Fodrey70'J. Rosales70'
Starting Line-ups
Louisville City FC · 3-4-3Austin FC · 3-4-3
Tap a player for name & stats · goalassist
Expected Goals (xG)2.001.34
Shots1416
Shots on Target73
Possession29%71%
Yellow Cards32
Corners97
Total Goals3
Formation3-4-3vs3-4-3
Goalkeeper Performance
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Louisville City FC GK
PSxG conceded–
Goals conceded1
Save %66.7%
Austin FC GK
PSxG conceded2.00
Goals conceded2
Goals saved0.00
Save %71.4%
Louisville City FC's keeper kept out 67% of the shots on target, while Austin FC's keeper performed right in line with expectations.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot