Manchester City beat Bournemouth 2-1 in the Premier League, with sustained possession and a higher volume of attacking pressure proving decisive against matching 4-2-3-1 systems. City controlled 66% of the ball and generated 2.36 xG from 13 shots, using their double pivot to establish territory before supplying the three attacking midfielders behind the striker. Bournemouth operated with 34% possession and only five attempts, but their direct approach still produced four shots on target and kept the hosts under pressure. Marcus Tavernier scored Bournemouth’s goal, while Josko Gvardiol and Marc Guehi supplied City’s two, underlining the home side’s ability to find decisive contributions beyond their forwards. The goalkeepers also influenced a narrow contest: City’s keeper saved 75% of the four efforts faced, while Bournemouth’s recorded a 66.67% save rate against six shots on target. Those figures reflect City’s greater attacking frequency, although Bournemouth’s accuracy ensured the advantage never became comfortable. Jarred Gillett oversaw a match ultimately settled by City’s territorial control and broader scoring threat. The victory strengthens City’s position at the start of the campaign.
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Manchester City GK
PSxG conceded2.01
Goals conceded1
Goals saved1.01
Save %75.0%
Bournemouth GK
PSxG conceded2.68
Goals conceded2
Goals saved0.68
Save %66.7%
Manchester City's keeper stopped about 1.0 goal more than an average keeper would, while Bournemouth's keeper stopped about 0.7 goal more than an average keeper would.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot