SEO Match Summary
Nashville SC defeated CF Montreal 1–0 in an MLS encounter where the hosts controlled proceedings with superior possession and efficiency. Sam Surridge's goal proved decisive as Nashville dominated with 63% possession and generated 1.7 expected goals from ten attempts, though they managed just one shot on target. Montreal's 4–3–3 shape struggled to create meaningful opportunities, registering only 0.66 xG across seven shots, with two reaching the goalkeeper. Nashville's defensive solidity was underscored by their goalkeeper's perfect save percentage, denying both Montreal efforts despite facing just two shots on target. De Oliveira's officiating remained largely peripheral in a straightforward tactical battle where Nashville's midfield control and clinical finishing separated the sides. The result extends Nashville's unbeaten run at home this season.
N
Nashville SC
C
CF Montreal
Expected Goals (xG)
1.70
0.66
Shots
10
7
Shots on Target
1
2
Possession
63%
37%
Post-Shot xG Faced
0.68
0.92
Goals Saved Above xG
+0.68
-0.08
Yellow Cards
1
1
Corners
3
2
Total Goals1
Formation4-2-3-1vs4-3-3
Goalkeeper Performance
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Nashville SC GK
PSxG conceded0.68
Goals conceded0
Goals saved0.68
Save %100.0%
CF Montreal GK
PSxG conceded0.92
Goals conceded1
Goals saved-0.08
Save %0.0%
Nashville SC's keeper stopped about 0.7 goal more than an average keeper would, while CF Montreal's keeper performed right in line with expectations.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot