Return to calendar
Sunday, August 30, 2026

Nashville SCOpen full analysisFC CincinnatiOpen full analysis

MLS 11.73X4.1524.05
SEO Match Summary
Nashville SC beat FC Cincinnati 4-0 in MLS, pairing a 4-4-2 structure with greater clinical edge in both penalty areas. Nashville held 52% possession and recorded 19 shots, seven on target, while producing 2.04 xG; Cincinnati remained competitive territorially with 48% possession, 15 attempts and 1.74 xG, but could not turn eight shots on target into a goal. Hany Mukhtar, Bryan Acosta and Sam Surridge were each on the scoresheet for Nashville, with the remaining goal completing a result that exceeded the home side’s expected-goals return. The decisive difference was defensive execution and goalkeeping: Nashville’s goalkeeper saved all eight shots on target faced, posting a 100% save percentage and 0.58 goals saved above expected. At the other end, Cincinnati’s goalkeeper saved 42.86% of Nashville’s seven efforts on target and conceded four times from 2.93 post-shot xG faced. Nashville gain a substantial boost to their goal difference.
Nashville SC N Nashville SC
4 0
Full Time
FC Cincinnati F FC Cincinnati
Hany MukhtarBryan AcostaSam Surridge
Expected Goals (xG) 2.04 1.74
Shots 19 15
Shots on Target 7 8
Possession 52% 48%
Post-Shot xG Faced 0.58 2.93
Yellow Cards 3 2
Total Goals4
Formation4-4-2vs3-4-1-2
Goalkeeper Performance

Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.

Nashville SC GK
PSxG conceded0.58
Goals conceded0
Goals saved0.58
Save %100.0%
FC Cincinnati GK
PSxG conceded2.93
Goals conceded4
Goals saved-1.07
Save %42.9%
Nashville SC's keeper stopped about 0.6 goal more than an average keeper would, while FC Cincinnati's keeper let in roughly 1.1 goal more than an average keeper would.

Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.

Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot