Nashville SC beat Inter Miami CF 4-1 in MLS, pairing a 4-3-3 structure with greater threat in the decisive areas despite having 45.0% possession. Hany Mukhtar led the scoring with two goals, while Andy Najar and Sam Surridge also struck for Nashville; Telasco Segovia scored Inter Miami’s reply. Nashville generated 2.41 xG from 18 shots and put eight efforts on target, compared with Miami’s 1.83 xG, 16 shots and four on target. Miami controlled 55.0% of the ball in their 4-4-2 but Nashville’s sharper work around goal defined the match. The visitors’ goalkeeper faced eight shots on target and recorded a 50.0% save percentage, with -1.52 goals saved above expected, while Nashville’s goalkeeper saved 75.0% of the four on-target attempts faced. Nashville take the three MLS points.
NNashville SC
4–1
Full Time
IInter Miami CF
A. Najar17'S. Surridge56'H. Mukhtar49', 63'B. Schwake63'E. Saad17', 49'C. Espinoza56'
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Nashville SC GK
PSxG conceded0.96
Goals conceded1
Goals saved-0.04
Save %75.0%
Inter Miami CF GK
PSxG conceded2.48
Goals conceded4
Goals saved-1.52
Save %50.0%
Nashville SC's keeper performed right in line with expectations, while Inter Miami CF's keeper let in roughly 1.5 goals more than an average keeper would.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot