Nashville SC defeated Minnesota United 3–1 at home in MLS action on 8 March, with the hosts' superior clinical finishing proving decisive in a match decided by shot quality rather than volume. Nashville's 4–2–3–1 setup controlled the game's rhythm, generating 1.33 xG from 15 shots, of which six found the target, with Sam Surridge netting twice and Cristian Espinoza adding a third. Minnesota, operating in a 4–3–2–1 formation, matched Nashville's shot count at 14 but managed only three on target and 0.89 xG, limitations compounded by goalkeeper struggles; their stopper conceded 0.64 xG above expected and recorded a 66.67 per cent save percentage. The visitors' solitary goal came through Nectarios Triantis, yet their inability to convert chances and defensive vulnerabilities proved costly against a Nashville side that capitalised on limited opportunities. Nashville's win underlines their improving attacking efficiency and home strength in the early season.
NNashville SC
3–1
Full Time
MMinnesota United
C. Espinoza33'S. Surridge26', 47'P. Yazbek26', 47'
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
Nashville SC GK
PSxG conceded0.64
Goals conceded1
Goals saved-0.36
Save %66.7%
Minnesota United GK
PSxG conceded2.32
Goals conceded3
Goals saved-0.68
Save %50.0%
Nashville SC's keeper performed right in line with expectations, while Minnesota United's keeper let in roughly 0.7 goal more than an average keeper would.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot