New England Revolution defeated Columbus Crew 2–1 in an MLS contest on April 19th, with the hosts capitalising on superior efficiency despite being outshot. Columbus dominated possession and created more opportunities, registering 11 shots to New England's 10, yet the Crew's 0.95 expected goals proved insufficient against a Revolution side that converted chances more clinically from 1.23 xG. New England's goalkeeper struggled with distribution, posting a 33.33 save percentage and conceding 1.55 post-shot expected goals, suggesting defensive vulnerability that Columbus nearly exploited. Carles Gil and Dor Turgeman scored for the hosts, whilst Maximilian Arfsten netted for the visitors in a match where New England's 4–2–3–1 setup proved more effective than Columbus's 4–4–2 in transitional moments. The result underscores the Revolution's ability to win tight contests through tactical discipline rather than dominance.
NNew England Revolution
2–1
Full Time
CColumbus Crew
C. Gil85'D. Turgeman54'L. Langoni54'
M. Arfsten24'D. Rossi24'
Starting Line-ups
New England Revolution · 4-2-3-1Columbus Crew · 4-4-2
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
New England Revolution GK
PSxG conceded1.18
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.18
Save %75.0%
Columbus Crew GK
PSxG conceded1.55
Goals conceded2
Goals saved-0.45
Save %33.3%
New England Revolution's keeper performed right in line with expectations, while Columbus Crew's keeper let in roughly 0.5 goal more than an average keeper would.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot