New England Revolution demolished FC Cincinnati 6–1 in an MLS encounter that exposed significant defensive vulnerabilities in the visitors' 3–5–2 setup. The Revolution's 4–2–3–1 formation proved far more effective in transition, with Brayan Ceballos bagging two goals as part of a clinical finishing display. Despite similar shot counts—Revolution 16 to Cincinnati's 15—the home side's superior accuracy was decisive: they registered 10 shots on target compared to Cincinnati's nine, whilst their expected goals of 1.88 substantially exceeded Cincinnati's 1.04. Revolution goalkeeper made a 40 per cent save rate but was undermined by poor defending, conceding 4.53 post-shot expected goals. Cincinnati's defensive structure crumbled in the second half, unable to contain the Revolution's attacking transitions. The result represents a significant gulf in current form between the two Eastern Conference sides.
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
New England Revolution GK
PSxG conceded1.45
Goals conceded1
Goals saved0.45
Save %88.9%
FC Cincinnati GK
PSxG conceded4.53
Goals conceded6
Goals saved-1.47
Save %40.0%
New England Revolution's keeper stopped about 0.5 goal more than an average keeper would, while FC Cincinnati's keeper let in roughly 1.5 goal more than an average keeper would.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot