New York City FC defeated Colorado Rapids 3–1 in an MLS encounter that underscored the hosts' superior efficiency in the final third. Operating in a 4–2–3–1 formation, NYCFC dominated proceedings with 13 shots and 8 on target, translating their 1.34 expected goals into a commanding scoreline. The Rapids, employing an identical shape, offered limited attacking threat with just 8 shots and 2 on target, generating 0.76 xG despite Darren Yapi's consolation goal. Colorado's goalkeeper was particularly exposed, posting a 50 per cent save percentage and underperforming their expected goals against by 0.49, highlighting the quality of NYCFC's chances. The disparity in shot accuracy proved decisive: while the visitors struggled to create clear-cut opportunities, the hosts' clinical finishing separated the teams decisively. NYCFC's dominance suggests sustained pressure on conference rivals.
NNew York City FC
3–1
Full Time
CColorado Rapids
N. Fernández21', 45'T. Magno85'M. Moralez85'
D. Yapi45+4'R. Navarro45+4'
Starting Line-ups
New York City FC · 4-2-3-1Colorado Rapids · 4-2-3-1
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
New York City FC GK
PSxG conceded0.51
Goals conceded1
Goals saved-0.49
Save %50.0%
Colorado Rapids GK
PSxG conceded2.13
Goals conceded3
Goals saved-0.87
Save %62.5%
New York City FC's keeper let in roughly 0.5 goal more than an average keeper would, while Colorado Rapids's keeper let in roughly 0.9 goal more than an average keeper would.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot