Inter Miami CF overcame New York City FC 3-2 in an MLS clash that exposed the hosts' defensive vulnerabilities. City dominated territorially with 11 shots and five on target, yet their underlying performance proved modest with an expected goals figure of just 1.25, whilst Miami's 4-4-2 setup generated greater attacking threat through 22 shots and 1.43 xG despite lower shot accuracy. The decisive factor lay in City's goalkeeping; their custodian managed only a 60 per cent save percentage and underperformed their xG model by 0.27, conceding 1.73 post-shot expected goals. Miami's clinical finishing proved the difference, with Lionel Messi, Micael and Gonzalo Lujan each finding the net alongside Agustin Ojeda's lone City response. Referee Armando Villarrea oversaw a match where possession data remained unavailable, though the shot disparity underlined Miami's dominance. City's defensive frailties raise immediate concerns ahead of their next fixture.
Read it this way: PSxG conceded is how dangerous the shots on target were, Goals conceded is how many actually went in, Goals saved is the gap between the two (higher is better, a minus means he should have saved more), and Save % is the share of on-target shots kept out.
New York City FC GK
PSxG conceded3.16
Goals conceded3
Goals saved0.16
Save %62.5%
Inter Miami CF GK
PSxG conceded1.73
Goals conceded2
Goals saved-0.27
Save %60.0%
Both keepers had a routine night, with little to separate them.
Game finished. Sign up to access full-season histograms, opponent-pulse modules, and referee-tendency analytics.
Inside the dashboards
Attack vs DefensexG, shots & goals — Home/Away per competition
Form Index & ReboundL5 momentum bar with rebound state per team
Goal Geolocation MapWhere the team scores & concedes — pitch heat
Cards IntelligenceYellow/Red filtered by referee & formation
Corner MasteryDistribution per opponent & tactical context
Top Scorers Cross-RefSquad ranked vs opponent & double-scorer combos
Referee TendencyTeam output under each referee they played for
Goalkeeper WeaknessWhere the keeper concedes — by zone & foot